Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: In 2008 I supported John Edwards....And then Obama. ...What was I thinking? [View all]Beacool
(30,518 posts)49. Oh yeah, I guess Hillary was too ambitious.
Never a good thing in a woman. What was Obama then, pray tell? He had only been in the Senate a mere two years before he thought that he was ready to be president.
To me the overconfident, over ambitious and arrogant one was Obama, not Hillary. She had worked hard, paid her dues and garnered experience. Experience that would have come in handy in handling the bag of angry cats that is Congress. I never had the feeling that he really gave a crap about the "little" people. Of the two Obamas, I think that Michelle does care a lot more than her husband.
My opinion, no one else has to agree with it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
102 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
In 2008 I supported John Edwards....And then Obama. ...What was I thinking? [View all]
Armstead
Apr 2013
OP
"Ignore the smell of the decaying corpse in the middle of the room . . ."
markpkessinger
Apr 2013
#85
Enough of that ProSense. If he can't stand up for seniors on Social Security
JDPriestly
Apr 2013
#92
Guess what. You'll Never Have to Vote for Obama nor Edwards for President Ever Again
Yavin4
Apr 2013
#8
Yeah, being the PERPETUAL Hillary apologist is so much more worthy of your time
Number23
Apr 2013
#68
You're right. That is certainly not something you'll ever have to worry about.
Number23
Apr 2013
#87
Focus on Congress, cast a symbolic vote for president. If we have a strong, progressive Dem
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#89
The FIRST thing Obama DID do was the stimulus - and it was as big as could pass Congress
karynnj
Apr 2013
#29
no argument on any of your points, but by the VA primary Kerry looked like a done deal
carolinayellowdog
Apr 2013
#42
Could it be that had Dean won the nomination and Presidency, you would have been dissapointed
karynnj
Apr 2013
#38
I was concerned about a Bush-Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Bush-Clinton-Clinton lock on the presidency
AndyA
Apr 2013
#26
I supported Obama - but it was because I could not overlook the obvious phoniness of Edwards
karynnj
Apr 2013
#28
Give the same amount of trust and skepticism to "our" folks as "the opposition" to start
TheKentuckian
Apr 2013
#44
I think that path has been closed off, lots of fail safes and bureaucratic entropy since FDR
TheKentuckian
Apr 2013
#102
You do realize that Obama couldn't actually do much in his first term, right?
AverageJoe90
Apr 2013
#46
I think the bigger problem is the poor choices we have to begin with
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#47
Thank you immoderate, good to be here with so many kindred spirits!
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#56
Wow, I didn't realize all the people here were for Edwards.The $400 haircut man.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#52
We're already on the slow road now...I can't live with that...although I'm not very pleased.
Auntie Bush
Apr 2013
#95
This place is going to be a nightmare for 3 1/2 years until we all get back to....
Walk away
Apr 2013
#77
He is as he presented himself to be: a moderate Democrat. If you saw something else,
Honeycombe8
Apr 2013
#101