Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)U.S. ‘Disgusted’ As Russia And China Veto U.N. Resolution On Syria [View all]
U.S. Disgusted As Russia And China Veto U.N. Resolution On Syria | Amid brutal violence in Syria, Russia and China vetoed a resolution before the 15-member body to support an Arab League plan to end the crisis. Earlier, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton gave dueling speeches in Munich, Germany. As a tyrant in Damascus brutalizes his own people, the U.S. and Europe stand shoulder to shoulder
alongside the Arab League, in demanding an end to the bloodshed and a democratic future for Syria, Clinton said. President Obama also threw his support behind the resolution and, going even farther, ended his statement by saying: The suffering citizens of Syria must know: we are with you, and the Assad regime must come to an end. But Russia and China blocked the resolution. U.N. ambassador to the U.N. Susan Rice, who tweeted that she was disgusted by the veto, said on the Council floor: This intransigence is even more shameful when you consider that at least one of these members Russia is still delivering weapons to Syria.
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/02/04/418928/russia-china-un-veto-syria/
http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/02/04/418928/russia-china-un-veto-syria/
66 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In fact, a repeat of Libya would likely happen even without any UN resolution.
Fool Count
Feb 2012
#53
"The US will not invade any country under Obama." Really? I would not bet $$$ on that, we will see
teddy51
Feb 2012
#28
I find it very interesting how people blame the US for allowing any horrible atrocities to happen in
Pirate Smile
Feb 2012
#15
I'm able to differentiate between various wars, military responses and police brutality.
Pirate Smile
Feb 2012
#33
You might want to revisit considering whether China and Russia are any better?
treestar
Feb 2012
#57
I'm in agreement with you! The US reputation in the world sucks big time over the past several
teddy51
Feb 2012
#30
That's what we say before the vote; then we do some fancy reinterpretation later
FarCenter
Feb 2012
#37
The simplest "changed circumstance" in this case would be Assad's refusal to step down
Fool Count
Feb 2012
#55
There seems to be a lack of comprehension between the Libyan resolution and the Syrian resolution.
tabatha
Feb 2012
#63
U.S. Vetoes of UN Resolutions Calling for an End to the Cuban Embargo 182-2
Tierra_y_Libertad
Feb 2012
#12
LOL- just like the US is disgusted by its own auto-veto against all resolutions regarding Israel.
Poll_Blind
Feb 2012
#23
I agree. And it's during times like this that our propping up of some regimes bits us on...
Poll_Blind
Feb 2012
#27
The US had it right, but unfortunately the United States has pretty much squandered all credibility
Cali_Democrat
Feb 2012
#34
The US is pushing for regime change in Syria as leverage against Iran. If Syria comes
Monk06
Feb 2012
#50
It's a move against Iran, but don't overlook the pipeline from Kurdistan to the Mediterranean
FarCenter
Feb 2012
#60
That 90% of the posts in this thread are condemning the US, not Russia or China or Syria, is vile.
Donald Ian Rankin
Feb 2012
#59
Branding attempts to support the Syrian opposition an "imperialistic adventure" is not liberal.
Donald Ian Rankin
Feb 2012
#65