Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

tabatha

(18,795 posts)
20. Amnesty: Syria Veto a 'Shockingly Callous Betrayal'
Sat Feb 4, 2012, 02:35 PM
Feb 2012

Russia and China's veto Saturday of a U.N. resolution on the bloodshed in Syria is a "shockingly callous betrayal" of the Syrian people, Amnesty International said. Moscow and Beijing have acted in a "completely irresponsible" way, the London-based human rights group added.

Russia and China vetoed a United Nations Security Council resolution condemning Syria for its lethal crackdown on protests, as activists said Syrian troops killed more than 230 people in shelling of the city of Homs.

"The decision by Russia and China... is a shockingly callous betrayal of the people of Syria," Amnesty said. The group's secretary-general Salil Shetty added: "This is a completely irresponsible use of the veto.

"It is staggering that they have blocked the passage of what was already a very weak draft resolution. "After a night in which the whole world watched the people of Homs suffering, the actions of these members are particularly shocking."

http://www.naharnet.com/stories/en/28949-amnesty-syria-veto-a-shockingly-callous-betrayal

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What? Someone blocked a resolution against a violent state in the mideast?! Scootaloo Feb 2012 #1
Heh! 2ndAmForComputers Feb 2012 #40
Nail, meet hammer! nt nanabugg Feb 2012 #45
Damn BeFree Feb 2012 #2
Did you read it? tabatha Feb 2012 #4
First step is the hardest BeFree Feb 2012 #5
You are wrong. tabatha Feb 2012 #9
Geez BeFree Feb 2012 #16
Thank goodness we have China keeping President Obama in check. nt Snake Alchemist Feb 2012 #18
The neocons are not in charge. tabatha Feb 2012 #22
It doesnt matter what the resolution says Dokkie Feb 2012 #39
100% correct malaise Feb 2012 #52
In fact, a repeat of Libya would likely happen even without any UN resolution. Fool Count Feb 2012 #53
lol Hutzpa Feb 2012 #46
Wow. You're quite the humanitarian. Pirate Smile Feb 2012 #8
They stopped us for now BeFree Feb 2012 #11
Please go and read the resolution. tabatha Feb 2012 #13
"The US will not invade any country under Obama." Really? I would not bet $$$ on that, we will see teddy51 Feb 2012 #28
Obama will not invade Iran - period. tabatha Feb 2012 #31
I find it very interesting how people blame the US for allowing any horrible atrocities to happen in Pirate Smile Feb 2012 #15
heh BeFree Feb 2012 #19
Nope. Pirate Smile Feb 2012 #26
heh BeFree Feb 2012 #29
I'm able to differentiate between various wars, military responses and police brutality. Pirate Smile Feb 2012 #33
You might want to revisit considering whether China and Russia are any better? treestar Feb 2012 #57
I'm in agreement with you! The US reputation in the world sucks big time over the past several teddy51 Feb 2012 #30
Russia unilaterally invaded Georgia in 2008. But so easily we forget. joshcryer Feb 2012 #43
You mean after Georgian forces began attacking Russian citizens? Scootaloo Feb 2012 #47
The question was "what countries did Russia invade." joshcryer Feb 2012 #48
Russia had said they agreed with the Arab League's plan. tabatha Feb 2012 #3
Russia is smart... they played us BeFree Feb 2012 #21
There was not even that type of language in there. tabatha Feb 2012 #24
Wow! MattSh Feb 2012 #49
You lie again, Russia never said it agreed with the Arab League plan. Fool Count Feb 2012 #54
Russia and China have long been supporting despot nations davidpdx Feb 2012 #56
Look at that Portugese ambassador - evil eye or what?!!! mwooldri Feb 2012 #58
Freedom drones!! No-fly zone!! Liberate them, quick! inna Feb 2012 #6
Oh good grief. tabatha Feb 2012 #10
nc inna Feb 2012 #14
Got a link to the text that was voted on? FarCenter Feb 2012 #35
A statement from Clinton tabatha Feb 2012 #36
That's what we say before the vote; then we do some fancy reinterpretation later FarCenter Feb 2012 #37
Unfortunately, that has always been the way western nations play at the UN mazzarro Feb 2012 #41
The simplest "changed circumstance" in this case would be Assad's refusal to step down Fool Count Feb 2012 #55
There seems to be a lack of comprehension between the Libyan resolution and the Syrian resolution. tabatha Feb 2012 #63
Nothing surprises me anymore. joshcryer Feb 2012 #42
not as if the US gives a flying fook about anyone's "veto", anyway inna Feb 2012 #7
U.S. Vetoes of UN Resolutions Calling for an End to the Cuban Embargo 182-2 Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #12
Human Rights Watch statement. tabatha Feb 2012 #17
Amnesty: Syria Veto a 'Shockingly Callous Betrayal' tabatha Feb 2012 #20
Thanks for posting the two statements n/t ProSense Feb 2012 #32
LOL- just like the US is disgusted by its own auto-veto against all resolutions regarding Israel. Poll_Blind Feb 2012 #23
I cannot but agree with the negative things that the US has done. tabatha Feb 2012 #25
I agree. And it's during times like this that our propping up of some regimes bits us on... Poll_Blind Feb 2012 #27
What you said. +1 Purveyor Feb 2012 #38
The US had it right, but unfortunately the United States has pretty much squandered all credibility Cali_Democrat Feb 2012 #34
no one really has a clue who is on who`s side in this civil/religious war. madrchsod Feb 2012 #44
It is not a religious war. tabatha Feb 2012 #61
The US is pushing for regime change in Syria as leverage against Iran. If Syria comes Monk06 Feb 2012 #50
+1000 ! polly7 Feb 2012 #51
It's a move against Iran, but don't overlook the pipeline from Kurdistan to the Mediterranean FarCenter Feb 2012 #60
That 90% of the posts in this thread are condemning the US, not Russia or China or Syria, is vile. Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2012 #59
Not all of the posters here are "liberal". tabatha Feb 2012 #62
So opposition to US imperialistic adventures is not "liberal"? FarCenter Feb 2012 #64
Branding attempts to support the Syrian opposition an "imperialistic adventure" is not liberal. Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2012 #65
Asserting that our support of the Syrian opposition is to benefit the people of Syria is just naive. FarCenter Feb 2012 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»U.S. ‘Disgusted’ As Russi...»Reply #20