Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Will anyone disagree with this? President Obama deserves harsh criticism over the Gitmo horror [View all]ProSense
(116,464 posts)65. ACLU: Urgent White House Action Needed to Avert Guantánamo Human Rights Crisis
Urgent White House Action Needed to Avert Guantánamo Human Rights Crisis
By Hina Shamsi, Director, ACLU National Security Project & Jamil Dakwar, Director, ACLU Human Rights Program
<...>
Guantánamo was not a problem that President Obama chose, but it's a problem he now owns and must solve. When the President took office, he promised to close Guantánamo within a year. As he moves further away from that promise, the futures of the detainees appear more hopeless to them. General John F. Kelly, head of the U.S. Southern Command, told the House Armed Services Committee last month about the Guantanamo prisoners, "They had great optimism that Guantánamo would be closed. They were devastated, apparently, when the president backed off."
An official from the International Committee of the Red Cross, whose delegates recently visited the prison and spoke to some of the hunger strikers, told the Russia Today news site:
And who can blame them? Sixty-five prisoners were released in the first two years of President Obama's first term, but that number plunged to just five during 2011 and 2012 combined, largely because of irresponsible restrictions imposed by Congress in an attempt to prevent Guantanamo from closing. But the Obama administration is also at fault. It has shown no signs of progress towards transferring the 86 detainees cleared for release, which it can still do despite Congressional restrictions. Instead, it recently closed the State Department office designated to work on prisoner transfers. Six prisoners face military commission trials; the Obama administration has slated over 40 of the rest for indefinite detention. It is no wonder that for at least some of the men at Guantanamo, death may appear the only way out. It need not be that way.
Today, the ACLU and a coalition of organizations are calling on President Obama to take two immediate steps to avert the human rights crisis:
http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-human-rights-prisoners-rights/urgent-white-house-action-needed-avert
By Hina Shamsi, Director, ACLU National Security Project & Jamil Dakwar, Director, ACLU Human Rights Program
<...>
Guantánamo was not a problem that President Obama chose, but it's a problem he now owns and must solve. When the President took office, he promised to close Guantánamo within a year. As he moves further away from that promise, the futures of the detainees appear more hopeless to them. General John F. Kelly, head of the U.S. Southern Command, told the House Armed Services Committee last month about the Guantanamo prisoners, "They had great optimism that Guantánamo would be closed. They were devastated, apparently, when the president backed off."
An official from the International Committee of the Red Cross, whose delegates recently visited the prison and spoke to some of the hunger strikers, told the Russia Today news site:
What I can tell you is that from our observations those tensions and this anguish that the detainees are experiencing are clearly related to the lack of a clear legal framework in Guantanamo. This has now been having a real impact for detainees for some time on their mental health, on their emotional health.
And who can blame them? Sixty-five prisoners were released in the first two years of President Obama's first term, but that number plunged to just five during 2011 and 2012 combined, largely because of irresponsible restrictions imposed by Congress in an attempt to prevent Guantanamo from closing. But the Obama administration is also at fault. It has shown no signs of progress towards transferring the 86 detainees cleared for release, which it can still do despite Congressional restrictions. Instead, it recently closed the State Department office designated to work on prisoner transfers. Six prisoners face military commission trials; the Obama administration has slated over 40 of the rest for indefinite detention. It is no wonder that for at least some of the men at Guantanamo, death may appear the only way out. It need not be that way.
Today, the ACLU and a coalition of organizations are calling on President Obama to take two immediate steps to avert the human rights crisis:
- First, the president should authorize the secretary of defense to use existing certification procedures to repatriate and resettle abroad all prisoners who have been cleared for release.
- Second, the president must appoint a point person in the administration who is responsible for leading the effort to close Guantánamo.
http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-human-rights-prisoners-rights/urgent-white-house-action-needed-avert
Congress banning the use of funds is a huge problem.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Will anyone disagree with this? President Obama deserves harsh criticism over the Gitmo horror [View all]
cali
Apr 2013
OP
A closed Gitmo is irrelevant if the inmates remain incarcerated somewhere else.
Maedhros
Apr 2013
#85
"Obama sought not to close Guantánamo but simply to re-locate it to Illinois" Thanks
grahamhgreen
Apr 2013
#90
Closing Gitmo won't end their incarceration. The plan was to transfer them to the U.S. and continue
Luminous Animal
Apr 2013
#10
They also acted like the prisoners were so EVIL they couldn't be allowed on US soil,....
Spitfire of ATJ
Apr 2013
#51
What a bag of bull shit. Obama was blocked from closing it by the Republicans in Congress.
olegramps
Apr 2013
#63
Apparently, yes. For some, when an embarassing issue is raised, it's always somebody else's fault.
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#8
uh, he can release those cleared to be released to begin with. He can do something about the
cali
Apr 2013
#13
Why does he need to close it down? Why not just charge or release the prisoners?
hughee99
Apr 2013
#16
Blame the right people: The Republicans!!!!! You're now on IGNORE. Good-bye!
Liberal_Stalwart71
Apr 2013
#79
I disagree most heartily, as does anyone else who doesn't have an "agenda".
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2013
#35
It's like a vicious dogpile. Dems are trying to lead on gun control, immigration reform, and.....
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2013
#45
And many of whom cannot return to their homes, because their governments don't want 'em.
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2013
#84
Haven't quite grasped the concept of "co-equal" branches of government, have you?
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2013
#47
Haven't quite grasped the concept of "indefinite detention without trial," have you?
Comrade Grumpy
Apr 2013
#61
Obama ordered GITMO closed and Republicans cut finding to move the prisoners....
Spitfire of ATJ
Apr 2013
#49
Absolutely. It would cost nothing, and not require any Congressional funding, for him to invite
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#54
We just came off the heels of the Bush Thugs acting like the rest of the world wants us dead.
Spitfire of ATJ
Apr 2013
#55
As far as I know, President Obama tried, but Democrats voted against him also.
akbacchus_BC
Apr 2013
#102
ACLU: Urgent White House Action Needed to Avert Guantánamo Human Rights Crisis
ProSense
Apr 2013
#65
If you continue, obfuscate or exonerate the crimes of your predecessor, hell yes!
RedCloud
Apr 2013
#68