Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

gopiscrap

(24,778 posts)

7. To me this is productive....

Reply to Neue Regel (Reply #6)

Sat Feb 4, 2012, 05:06 PM

Feb 2012

if we take out a republican asshat organization that's less public airspace their using and more of an ability to get the Dem side of things out...besides why duplicate a good charity, give to Planned Parenthood and your local Dem. Congresscritter's campaign!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here's an oldie-but-goodie article: Komen suing other charities for using the word "cure" [View all] Hugabear Feb 2012 OP

Typical repigs - they care more about property rights than women's health. kestrel91316 Feb 2012 #1

not to mention the arrogance of trying to own "cure" anyway. TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #5

This organization has woken a sleeping tiger. Women will give heavily to PP from now on. southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #2

God I hope so gopiscrap Feb 2012 #4

Or you could do something productive... Neue Regel Feb 2012 #6

To me this is productive.... gopiscrap Feb 2012 #7

Yes your right. But OWS would bring attention to what they are not doing? I think southernyankeebelle Feb 2012 #15

The stupid thing is, if anyone uses the word CURE, for a medical advancement, they will be visited b WingDinger Feb 2012 #3

After reading the article, your title isn't accurate Neue Regel Feb 2012 #8

"Intellectual property" goes with "non-profit" izquierdista Feb 2012 #9

I think they should be more lenient than for-profits in allowing similar use of their TM Neue Regel Feb 2012 #10

They don't have to "defend their trademark" in those cases izquierdista Feb 2012 #13

I'm sorry, this is a nonsensical argument given that... JackRiddler Feb 2012 #11

You say it's a nonsensical argument Neue Regel Feb 2012 #12

"I am not an intellectual property attorney" JackRiddler Feb 2012 #16

How would "most people" confuse a lung cancer charity, "Kites for a Cure" with SGK? targetpractice Feb 2012 #14