Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(11,304 posts)

15. Yes your right. But OWS would bring attention to what they are not doing? I think

Sat Feb 4, 2012, 06:06 PM

Feb 2012

it would be a good example but it must be done respectfully and not create chaos. That won't work.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

16 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

not to mention the arrogance of trying to own "cure" anyway. TheKentuckian Feb 2012 #5

God I hope so gopiscrap Feb 2012 #4

Or you could do something productive... Neue Regel Feb 2012 #6

To me this is productive.... gopiscrap Feb 2012 #7

After reading the article, your title isn't accurate Neue Regel Feb 2012 #8

"Intellectual property" goes with "non-profit" izquierdista Feb 2012 #9

They don't have to "defend their trademark" in those cases izquierdista Feb 2012 #13

I'm sorry, this is a nonsensical argument given that... JackRiddler Feb 2012 #11

You say it's a nonsensical argument Neue Regel Feb 2012 #12

"I am not an intellectual property attorney" JackRiddler Feb 2012 #16