Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ms.smiler

(551 posts)
20. DarkLink, I’ll attempt to answer your question.
Tue Apr 16, 2013, 03:23 PM
Apr 2013

Yes, you are correct in that in some states/situations a wrongfully foreclosed homeowner can sue for their property in addition to noteworthy money damages.

In general, wrongful foreclosure is good for 3 times or more of the value of the property. In such a lawsuit Breach of Contract & Slander of Title are also applicable and have their own equitable damages. Some of these lawsuits even include punitive damages.

Some homeowners who receive checks will assume the foreclosing party made some small insignificant error and go on with their lives. Others though will view their checks as confirmation of what they knew in their gut, that their homes were stolen from them.

Unfortunately, I do not expect our government to hold the banksters accountable for this massive fraud. It has been and remains my belief that it will be up to each homeowner to stand up for their rights and sue. Those who make such an effort should expect 7 figure settlements/awards.

I caught on to the fact that under the laws of my state, my mortgage was null and void only months after I signed the mortgage contract. My mortgage servicer even filed two invalid, robo-signed Assignments on my property. I spent months seeking suitable counsel and it cost me $2,500 to file a Quiet Title action in which I hope and expect to kick my mortgage to the curb.

Of course I wonder how many homeowners in my state were foreclosed when their mortgages were actually null and void under PA law.

It costs nothing to speak to an attorney on the phone. A good attorney will happily spend an hour or so talking with you in their office. Depending upon the attorney and the case, I’m sure many would agree to a share of the damages they obtain rather than payment from the homeowner.

Our Recorder of Deeds offices are actually crime scenes. Stored in counties across the country are the means to hold the banksters accountable.

The homeowners receiving these checks fortunately retain their rights and claims. How many homeowners will stand up, demand their rights and their 7 figure damages? Many I hope.


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I can understand the need to bailout AIG.... Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #1
Bush bailed out the banks before Obama was in office. tridim Apr 2013 #4
Bush couldn't have bailed them out without Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #7
Why did you ONLY blame democrats? tridim Apr 2013 #12
To some extent.... Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #13
If you remember, Congress first voted against the bailout. That was in response to the huge, it was sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #31
I've read several books on this subject. Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #34
Paulson with Co-Conspirators: bvar22 Apr 2013 #9
Well fuck, that looks like two 'democrats' standing beside him. CrispyQ Apr 2013 #35
And supported overwhelmingly by Democrats (including Obama) progressoid Apr 2013 #10
I was responding to a post that blamed ONLY Democrats. tridim Apr 2013 #11
Oh, since you didn't make any reference to any other Democrats, progressoid Apr 2013 #16
Because homeowners don't have a lobby to write the laws Marrah_G Apr 2013 #5
It is aggravating beyond belief Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #8
One or two people on one anonymous forum on an unknown website said "insufficient funds". tridim Apr 2013 #2
My friend was illegally foreclosed on in 2009. The 'law mill' that drove her out of her home, is now sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #6
I have a check coming from the bank that illegally foreclosed on my home.. tridim Apr 2013 #14
The $800 isn't intended to compensate the value of the home Orrex Apr 2013 #15
I'm sorry you had to deal with this. sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #21
The pre-payout mailing that we got a week or so ago specifically addresses that, in fact Orrex Apr 2013 #24
She did get that but didn't trust it I guess after all she went through initially. sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #25
Here's a little bit more from the online source: Orrex Apr 2013 #27
I hope not. Xithras Apr 2013 #3
Wouldn't the proper response be for the homeowners to get their homes back? DarkLink Apr 2013 #17
DarkLink, I’ll attempt to answer your question. ms.smiler Apr 2013 #20
My friend is planning to sue Wells Fargo for the loss of her home. She did not accept the miserable sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #22
Sabrina 1, I understand your concerns. ms.smiler Apr 2013 #26
Lol, thinking how lucky your niece was to have you around at that time. You gave me valuable sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #29
Is it a wrongful foreclosure because they were making payments on time, but for some sammytko Apr 2013 #30
In some cases, quite a few actually, when people realized they might have problems keeping up their sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #32
Sammytko, fraud more than anything explains wrongful foreclosure. ms.smiler Apr 2013 #33
We should have bailed out the populace, not the banks. sakabatou Apr 2013 #18
Who administers the payouts? pa28 Apr 2013 #19
As far as I know, third party 'contractors' were supposed to be hired to manage the payouts. But sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #23
Bookmarking this thread and looking around for some other sources. pa28 Apr 2013 #28
Rust Consulting apologizes. ms.smiler Apr 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Foreclosure victims begin...»Reply #20