For all those "interpreters" of the Second Amendment, here's a question for you:

[petronius]

67. Yes, they all agreed that it protects an individual and not a collective right

From the Scalia opinion (just one sample):

Putting all of these textual elements together, we find that they guarantee the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation.

From the Stevens dissent:

The question presented by this case is not whether the Second Amendment protects a “collective right” or an “individual right.” Surely it protects a right that can be enforced by individuals.

From the Breyer dissent:

I take as a starting point the following four propositions, based on our precedent and today’s opinions, to which I believe the entire Court subscribes:

(1) The Amendment protects an “individual” right—i.e., one that is separately possessed, and may be separately enforced, by each person on whom it is conferred.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html

The question is the degree to which restrictions and limitations on this individual right are allowed - the Court was unanimous that the right is individual, but 5-4 on whether the D.C. law infringed...