Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 83 dead and another 163 wounded . . . . and no headlines about it. [View all]brett_jv
(1,245 posts)42. Don't be silly ... nobody is talking about 'gun prohibition'.
We talking about gun REGULATION. Kinda like we have for most dangerous things ... like ... say ALCOHOL.
Outright alcohol prohibition clearly didn't work, but I guarantee you that a lot less people under 21 drink alcohol than would be the case if we hadn't made it illegal for them to buy it. Regulations can, and do ... work.
I'd also argue that there's great possibility that law-abiding citizens could play a role in reducing gun violence by the existence of them observing 'regulations'. Like ... law-abiding citizens NOT selling guns w/o background checks, and keeping their guns locked up in safes when not in use, and NOT selling large magazines to anybody who wants them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
83 dead and another 163 wounded . . . . and no headlines about it. [View all]
Stinky The Clown
Apr 2013
OP
Great way of putting it. Does fit them, like Gollum, pitiful and dangerous because of it.
rwsanders
Apr 2013
#30
Are you seriously trying to equate murders and suicides with alcohol related deaths?
morningfog
Apr 2013
#13
Are you suggesting there aren't any alcohol related murders, suicides, sexual assaults, etc.?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#17
Please don't play obtuse and pretend to be unaware of alcohol fueled rage/depression
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#28
Are you arguing that some gun control measure would make the drunks less lethal?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#39
The bill that sank today would have done nothing to prevent the tragedy it was
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#49
I looked over your earlier posts and don't see those laws-- perhaps you could point
NoMoreWarNow
Apr 2013
#73
You've approached the conversation so politely, frankly, I'm taken aback
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#75
Maybe I'm less tolerant because of Monday, but I suggest you crawl back to the
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#25
Yes, Master. Right away, Master. Is there anything I can get you before I go, Master?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#29
Yup, sure enough, I'm less tolerant because of Monday. What's your excuse?
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#31
You act as if your tolerance has some sort of relevance. You're nobody to me.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#32
See, the thing is I'm usually a tolerant person (by DU standards even) and having
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#43
Wow... "high-dudgeon internet tough guy" I like that. New user name someday. Meanwhile
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#53
Sorry, but gun control advocates aren't the only ones allowed to cite research
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#54
My lack of a 'substantive reply' served to demonstrate that you had no real point. Even if
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#63
"...your fellow gun-grabbers" OK I guess that confirms my suspicion about your motives
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#69
argumentum ad populum is the best you can do? Middle school debate teams know better than that.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#82
You're farting in the wind trying to convince us of the NRA side of the debate
DainBramaged
Apr 2013
#83
These are but small prices the right wing willingly, even gleefully, requires Americans to pay in
indepat
Apr 2013
#6
You have to take the guns away from urban males 15 to 35 to have any effect on that.
FarCenter
Apr 2013
#11
You'd think that they could adapt Ka band radar guns to detect weapons under clothing on the street
FarCenter
Apr 2013
#24
Was listening to right wing radio and everyone wants cameras on every street now because of Boston
Quixote1818
Apr 2013
#27
Yup. Only the absolutely rarest kind of shooting (random mass shootings) gets any coverage...
Recursion
Apr 2013
#52
Yeah, it's insane. Handguns are the menace. Easily conceable and only designed for one purpose. nt
raouldukelives
Apr 2013
#61
Would you feel better if the murder victims were stabbed or beaten, or killed by bombs?
slackmaster
Apr 2013
#55
Every big city gets the same. Maybe even two or three in a single day. But that is NOT the story.
Stinky The Clown
Apr 2013
#79
It's only a story if it's different. Cars kill a lot of people every day...no headlines.
Honeycombe8
Apr 2013
#80