Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 83 dead and another 163 wounded . . . . and no headlines about it. [View all]FailureToCommunicate
(14,597 posts)53. Wow... "high-dudgeon internet tough guy" I like that. New user name someday. Meanwhile
your replies only confirm what I suspected about being empathy impaired. First of all, I didn't demand that you leave this thread. I "suggested" Secondly, you ask for the tired old 'if you have an actual rebuttal to what I post' bulltwanky. That's the thing about RKBA forum folks, you post pro gun non-secquitor "arguments" like 'Well, he could have killed the guy with a baseball bat' or 'What about all the alcohol related deaths' and then try to fulminate side discussions that let you espouse your beliefs. I fell for it. Well, I gotta get back to practicing my high-dudgeon-ness. See ya. (BTW, I DO like your profile pic of the embracing Obamas!)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
83 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
83 dead and another 163 wounded . . . . and no headlines about it. [View all]
Stinky The Clown
Apr 2013
OP
Great way of putting it. Does fit them, like Gollum, pitiful and dangerous because of it.
rwsanders
Apr 2013
#30
Are you seriously trying to equate murders and suicides with alcohol related deaths?
morningfog
Apr 2013
#13
Are you suggesting there aren't any alcohol related murders, suicides, sexual assaults, etc.?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#17
Please don't play obtuse and pretend to be unaware of alcohol fueled rage/depression
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#28
Are you arguing that some gun control measure would make the drunks less lethal?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#39
The bill that sank today would have done nothing to prevent the tragedy it was
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#49
I looked over your earlier posts and don't see those laws-- perhaps you could point
NoMoreWarNow
Apr 2013
#73
You've approached the conversation so politely, frankly, I'm taken aback
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#75
Maybe I'm less tolerant because of Monday, but I suggest you crawl back to the
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#25
Yes, Master. Right away, Master. Is there anything I can get you before I go, Master?
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#29
Yup, sure enough, I'm less tolerant because of Monday. What's your excuse?
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#31
You act as if your tolerance has some sort of relevance. You're nobody to me.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#32
See, the thing is I'm usually a tolerant person (by DU standards even) and having
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#43
Wow... "high-dudgeon internet tough guy" I like that. New user name someday. Meanwhile
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#53
Sorry, but gun control advocates aren't the only ones allowed to cite research
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#54
My lack of a 'substantive reply' served to demonstrate that you had no real point. Even if
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#63
"...your fellow gun-grabbers" OK I guess that confirms my suspicion about your motives
FailureToCommunicate
Apr 2013
#69
argumentum ad populum is the best you can do? Middle school debate teams know better than that.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#82
You're farting in the wind trying to convince us of the NRA side of the debate
DainBramaged
Apr 2013
#83
These are but small prices the right wing willingly, even gleefully, requires Americans to pay in
indepat
Apr 2013
#6
You have to take the guns away from urban males 15 to 35 to have any effect on that.
FarCenter
Apr 2013
#11
You'd think that they could adapt Ka band radar guns to detect weapons under clothing on the street
FarCenter
Apr 2013
#24
Was listening to right wing radio and everyone wants cameras on every street now because of Boston
Quixote1818
Apr 2013
#27
Yup. Only the absolutely rarest kind of shooting (random mass shootings) gets any coverage...
Recursion
Apr 2013
#52
Yeah, it's insane. Handguns are the menace. Easily conceable and only designed for one purpose. nt
raouldukelives
Apr 2013
#61
Would you feel better if the murder victims were stabbed or beaten, or killed by bombs?
slackmaster
Apr 2013
#55
Every big city gets the same. Maybe even two or three in a single day. But that is NOT the story.
Stinky The Clown
Apr 2013
#79
It's only a story if it's different. Cars kill a lot of people every day...no headlines.
Honeycombe8
Apr 2013
#80