Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

pinto

(106,886 posts)

7. BS

Reply to ErikJ (Original post)

Thu Apr 18, 2013, 01:47 PM

Apr 2013

Background checks utilize currently established data bases, as I understand it. They don't *expand* government oversight, they link established data bases to gun purchases.

His logic is full of misdirection.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

15 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Mike Lee: Why I voted against background checks [View all] ErikJ Apr 2013 OP

so basically he's saying the american people are too f*cki dumb to understand background checks..... bowens43 Apr 2013 #1

so we track cars but not guns. ok. got it. ZRT2209 Apr 2013 #2

OK, asshole, here's an easy one: all firearms transfers go through an FFL Recursion Apr 2013 #3

Oh please...vote this fucker out alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #4

So Then Why the Heck Didn't You Offer Amendments to Correct Its Flaws Instead? dballance Apr 2013 #5

Mike Lee, R-Utah WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2013 #6

BS pinto Apr 2013 #7

Nothing but rubbish! GitRDun Apr 2013 #8

With all due respect, Senator Mike Lee... trotsky Apr 2013 #9

Shorter Mike Lee: I'd make love to my guns if I could. nt geek tragedy Apr 2013 #10

Mike Lee======= Just another lobbist for Wellstone ruled Apr 2013 #11

That poll could use some DU love wryter2000 Apr 2013 #12

Because (R)-Utah LadyHawkAZ Apr 2013 #13

a long diatribe for, "If Obama is for it, I'm against it" Sheepshank Apr 2013 #14

OK then let me debunk his pt about gov monitoring "constitutionally protected activity" alp227 Apr 2013 #15