Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Drug Czar: No State Can Nullify Federal Marijuana Ban [View all]cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)26. Perhaps the quote is being misread? 'Cause there's no controversy here
I oppose enforcement of federal pot laws 100%. Very pro-pot.
The quote in the article, however, is not referring to LOCAL law enforcement so it's really a statement of the law, and of the status quo
No state law trumps federal law, but a state can decide to not enforce federal law. New York dropped out of prohibition in the 1920s, outlawing use of state funds to enforce prohibition. But Treasury agents could still hassle drinkers in New York... just without cooperation from the NYPD or state police.
Gil Kerlikowske said enforcement of the Controlled Substances Act of 1970 which ranks marijuana as a Schedule One drug alongside heroin, LSD and ecstasy remains in the hands of the US Department of Justice. (CORRECT)
No state, no executive can nullify a statute that has been passed by Congress, the director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy told a National Press Club luncheon. (CORRECT)
Lets be clear: law enforcement officers take an oath of office to uphold federal law and they are going to continue to pursue drug traffickers and drug dealers, he said. (CORRECT, in reference to federal law enforcement officers. As to which LE he was referring to, the previous statements offer more than enough context.)
No state, no executive can nullify a statute that has been passed by Congress, the director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy told a National Press Club luncheon. (CORRECT)
Lets be clear: law enforcement officers take an oath of office to uphold federal law and they are going to continue to pursue drug traffickers and drug dealers, he said. (CORRECT, in reference to federal law enforcement officers. As to which LE he was referring to, the previous statements offer more than enough context.)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
37 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest the WH is already well aware of his statement.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#22
For what? Understanding the Constitution? Federal law trumps state law ... end of discussion.
11 Bravo
Apr 2013
#31
Yes. Let's harsh all over this dude. If the white house can jail whistleblowers and have a kill list
grahamhgreen
Apr 2013
#37
“Let’s be clear: law enforcement officers take an oath of office to uphold federal law..."
MindPilot
Apr 2013
#7
If they prosecuted Wall Street crooks the same way they do inner-city youths...
Hugabear
Apr 2013
#8
The Executive can reschedule and shift focus. This is a choice to a significant degree.
TheKentuckian
Apr 2013
#19
Okay, then send in the DEA. Because the cops in legal states aren't going to bust you.
Comrade Grumpy
Apr 2013
#20