Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Tom Rinaldo

(23,187 posts)
Fri Apr 19, 2013, 10:12 AM Apr 2013

As a side point, I'm waiting to see where they got their guns for the shootout [View all]

It is sad that people have to become symbols of something else for sane gun safety policy to have any chance of being enacted. Of course Sandy Hook was absolutely horrific, but we lost tens of thousands of innocents to guns every year before an elementary school massacre finally galvanized a new movement for gun safety. Now we have these two brothers, absolute terrorists in the eyes of all. Yes they used IED's to kill in Boston, but they obviously had semi-automatic weapons also. Two officers are down, one fatally. The FBI called them "armed and dangerous". How did they get their arms? Did they come from a licensed gun dealer? From a gun show? From the internet?

Sooner or later we will have people who everyone in politics agrees are full blown terrorists gunning down innocents with guns purchased without going through any background checks. Sooner or later they will use extended capacity ammo clips to hold off police during a fire fight to make a getaway. Maybe these brothers would have passed a background check. Maybe their gun magazines only held ten bullets each instead of 30 or a hundred. But the Public will not stand for it when they realize that real terrorists are killing Americans because of lax gun regulations.

25 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
whatever the case is, the answer will be more guns. ejpoeta Apr 2013 #1
The "usual suspects" will say so, yes Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #3
I bet that's the same thought going through the minds of people Dreamer Tatum Apr 2013 #2
My guess is that before last week these guys would have passed a background check. upaloopa Apr 2013 #4
I suspect you are right Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #5
How did they get their guns and ammo? jpak Apr 2013 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #7
Yeah, other then cooking that is Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #8
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2013 #10
OK, here is a math problem for you then Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #12
good luck with this. mikeysnot Apr 2013 #9
Do you have any idea of what the chemicals you have under the kitchen sink can do? RC Apr 2013 #15
Doesn't matter. "Legal" and "Illegal" can be turned into talking-points. DetlefK Apr 2013 #11
I honestly don't get the point you are making Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #20
My point was your point ;-) DetlefK Apr 2013 #25
Tom Rinaldo Hoops59 Apr 2013 #13
I'm waiting for the web surfing profile software... Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #16
Guns were the gateway. They cloud judgment with intoxicated empowerment. Loudly Apr 2013 #14
Maybe yes for some. Me, I just think combat weapons are an efficient means... Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #17
This is what they're going to say: LuvNewcastle Apr 2013 #18
They will. They will also say that background checks will lead to confiscation Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #19
You're about 15 years too late with that.. sir pball Apr 2013 #21
Things happen in waves and nothing moves forward when the current goes against you but tides change Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #22
Let's hope so. smirkymonkey Apr 2013 #23
On the bright side sandmann Apr 2013 #24
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»As a side point, I'm wait...