Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Meet the 28-Year-Old Grad Student Who Just Shook the Global Austerity Movement [View all]Jim__
(15,286 posts)43. Here's a link to Herndon's very readable paper.
Link
An excerpt:
An excerpt:
...
RR adopts a non-standard weighting methodology for measuring average real GDP growth
within their four public debt/GDP categories. After assigning each country-year to one of
four public debt/GDP groups, RR calculates the average real GDP growth for each country
within the group, that is, a single average value for the country for all the years it appeared
in the category. For example, real GDP growth in the UK averaged 2.4 percent per year
during the 19 years that the UK appeared in the highest public debt/GDP category while
real GDP growth for the US averaged -2.0 percent per year during the 4 years that the
US appeared in the highest category. The country averages within each group were then
averaged, equally weighted by country, to calculate the average real GDP growth rate within
each public debt/GDP grouping.
RR does not indicate or discuss the decision to weight equally by country rather than by
country-year. In fact, possible within-country serially correlated relationships could support
an argument that not every additional country-year contributes proportionally additional
information. Yet equal weighting of country averages entirely ignores the number of years
that a country experienced a high level of public debt relative to GDP. Thus, the existence
of serial correlation could mean that, with Greece and the UK, 19 years carrying a public
debt/GDP load over 90 percent and averaging 2.9 percent and 2.4 percent GDP growth
respectively do not each warrant 19 times the weight as New Zealand's single year at -7.6
percent GDP growth or fivve times the weight as the US's four years with an average of -2.0
percent GDP growth. But equal weighting by country gives a one-year episode as much
weight as nearly two decades in the above 90 percent public debt/GDP range. RR needs to
justify this methodology in detail. It otherwise appears arbitrary and unsupportable.
...
RR adopts a non-standard weighting methodology for measuring average real GDP growth
within their four public debt/GDP categories. After assigning each country-year to one of
four public debt/GDP groups, RR calculates the average real GDP growth for each country
within the group, that is, a single average value for the country for all the years it appeared
in the category. For example, real GDP growth in the UK averaged 2.4 percent per year
during the 19 years that the UK appeared in the highest public debt/GDP category while
real GDP growth for the US averaged -2.0 percent per year during the 4 years that the
US appeared in the highest category. The country averages within each group were then
averaged, equally weighted by country, to calculate the average real GDP growth rate within
each public debt/GDP grouping.
RR does not indicate or discuss the decision to weight equally by country rather than by
country-year. In fact, possible within-country serially correlated relationships could support
an argument that not every additional country-year contributes proportionally additional
information. Yet equal weighting of country averages entirely ignores the number of years
that a country experienced a high level of public debt relative to GDP. Thus, the existence
of serial correlation could mean that, with Greece and the UK, 19 years carrying a public
debt/GDP load over 90 percent and averaging 2.9 percent and 2.4 percent GDP growth
respectively do not each warrant 19 times the weight as New Zealand's single year at -7.6
percent GDP growth or fivve times the weight as the US's four years with an average of -2.0
percent GDP growth. But equal weighting by country gives a one-year episode as much
weight as nearly two decades in the above 90 percent public debt/GDP range. RR needs to
justify this methodology in detail. It otherwise appears arbitrary and unsupportable.
...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Meet the 28-Year-Old Grad Student Who Just Shook the Global Austerity Movement [View all]
Scuba
Apr 2013
OP
He is tryingto guide us. But, our people and politicians don't seem to want any expert
ladjf
Apr 2013
#14
Before this thing came to light, PK was on MOrning Joe rebutting the entire panel all by
CTyankee
Apr 2013
#18
Lying in America's is the only thing we continue to manufacture in mass quantities.
Bozvotros
Apr 2013
#106
I think that Australia and Canada, at least, might have been purposely omitted
Art_from_Ark
Apr 2013
#109
Yes, I wonder why people like Krugman and Dean Baker, Stiglitz among others are not part of the
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#100
PK has written about that. He said he wouldn't be interested and it wouldn't be a good
CTyankee
Apr 2013
#103
Yes, I know, that's why I mentioned a few others. We have plenty of great economists in this country
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#104
It may change, tho! The development with this grad student taking down R. and R. is a
CTyankee
Apr 2013
#105
Nah, Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor and Rand Paul will still be citing this study years from now.
Scuba
Apr 2013
#11
You are a "dark one". But, you just may well be correct. There are people who would
ladjf
Apr 2013
#16
My thought exactly. "Strange" how their error worked to confirm their hypothesis...
NoodleyAppendage
Apr 2013
#19
Maybe that's why it was reported that they did not release their data which is a breach of ethics
byeya
Apr 2013
#23
Yes most scientific reports include the data. I was surprised to read that he had to email them and
Maraya1969
Apr 2013
#79
Threads on economics and workplace democracy seem to get little play here although they
byeya
Apr 2013
#28
What did Thomas see? Debt doesn't stall growth. I wish he would of added that sharing money=pro
midnight
Apr 2013
#48
Debt can, and often is, cancelled. Chapter 11 bankruptcy can leave creditors high and dry(except
byeya
Apr 2013
#59
Two comments about the Reinhart and Rogoff study promoting economic austerity.
AdHocSolver
Apr 2013
#78