Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The terrorists fired over 200 rounds in last night's gun battle with police. [View all]Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)96. A reasonable limit would be what professionals and hobbyists find to be most practical.
30-round magazines are standard issue and most popular.
no citizen should ever expect to have to take on numerous baddies with numerous assault weapons.
No one expects to get into a serious car accident, either. And, again, police carry semi-automatic rifles not because they are assaulting fortified positions but because in the course of their duties they predominantly encounter singular criminals. Their professional experience has presumably taught them that a semi-automatic rifle is best for gaining the tactical advantage. They also carry 30-round clips to also confront singular criminals -- not for mass-killing -- and not one of them ever complained of having too much ammunition at the end of the encounter.
Regardless, THAT is what our police force is for.
More fictions.
The Constitution was well-aware that constabulary agencies existed in its day and yet the right to personal self defense was codified. Nowhere does it presume citizens are expected to wait passively for the police that entire premise was shot down in both the Heller and the McDonald decisions.
In the real world, citizens don't go all out John McClane style taking out a dozen terrorists or criminals with assault weapons.
You're right. They don't. So why bother making up such a ridiculous statement? Lying only makes you look like a liar.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The terrorists fired over 200 rounds in last night's gun battle with police. [View all]
onehandle
Apr 2013
OP
People don't have a right to heroin. People do have a right to self-defense.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#31
And self defense means 100 round mags? Perhaps 1000? The right to own aircraft carriers?
EOTE
Apr 2013
#32
If mass-killing were its only purpose police wouldn't carry them for lone-criminal encounters.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#90
A reasonable limit would be what professionals and hobbyists find to be most practical.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#96
Non-existent scenarios? Like the one where you need to take on a dozen terrorists?
EOTE
Apr 2013
#103
It's not my fault if the gun nuts in this country make the only possible actions watered down ones.
EOTE
Apr 2013
#35
On the video - you can hear lots of gun shots - and "cracks" that were the explosions
jpak
Apr 2013
#37
And where and how they acquired all that firepower. Legally or illegally... nt
riderinthestorm
Apr 2013
#13
And when did they acquire it? They may have been stockpiling for some time. nt
BootinUp
Apr 2013
#16
The police can use untagged ammo - and I see no evidence that taggants are a safety issue
jpak
Apr 2013
#74
Right. Unless these two morons had full auto assault weapons. I would doubt that.
cliffordu
Apr 2013
#66
There is no such thing as a full-auto assault weapon. Cops *may* have full auto weapons
Recursion
Apr 2013
#104