Poll_Blind could give less of a shit about the exact moment he's read his Miranda rights.

[Yo_Mama]

75. There is a public safety exception rom Miranda penalties under certain circs

That's included with Miranda rights.

This is a very obvious case in which public safety is of concern.

There are public safety exemptions or exceptions to most of the Bill of Rights. So, police can't come into your house without a warrant, but if a policeman hears gunshots and screams, the police officer is allowed to break in - in the cause of protecting life.

This is not a strained interpretation of the public safety provision, so no one's rights are being injured here and it sets no bad or new precedent.
http://www.fbi.gov/stats-services/publications/law-enforcement-bulletin/february2011/legal_digest

Whenever the prosecution seeks in its direct case to introduce a statement made by a suspect while in custody and in response to interrogation, it must prove that the subject was warned of specific rights and voluntarily waived those rights.4

Now the penalty for not following Miranda procedures is that statements gained from the non-Mirandized statements cannot be introduced in court, and evidence developed from those statements will be thrown out. The public safety exception just means that evidence gained from such questions can be introduced in court.

That's really the only "teeth" that Miranda has, but those are big teeth.

However in this case there is tremendous evidence accumulated before arrest combined with the physical facts of the arrest and the prosecution does not need to rely on any of these statements to do anything except possibly protect the public, so the authorities would have to be crazy to immediately read the guy his Miranda rights. No, instead they are going to ask questions about other bombs and materials out there. Stuff like that.

There's a reason why the public safety exception exists, it exists to protect other people's rights, and they are not doing anything odd or illegal here. They took him to the hospital for medical treatment, so questioning will be limited anyway.

Even if a judge later found that their questioning crossed the acceptable line, all it would mean wouldevi be that his answers to those questions, or any evidence found on the basis of those questions, would not be admissible. It would not contaminate all the other evidence.

If you stop and think about what law enforcement priorities are supposed to be, failure to allow the public safety exception would force cops to ask those questions any way. At all stages of any investigation or arrest, public safety is supposed to be preeminent. It isn't always, but it is supposed to be. The courts are not going to create a situation that forces cops and prosecutors to abandon prosecutions in order to protect the lives of others.