Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
8. The basis of the Miranda warning is the 5th Amend. protection against self-incrimination and the 6th
Sat Apr 20, 2013, 09:40 AM
Apr 2013

Amendment rights to a fair trial.

I agree it works to insulate the authorities, as well, from accusations of undue force and duress in questioning. But, there is yet another reason not to Mirandize a suspect. The questions asked and the answers given can be kept off the record.

The really interesting question here is why the FBI wants to interrogate him "off the record." May I suggest that this has something to do with the brother's trip to Russia in 2011, and the FBI's interviews of the family at that time, as well as the fact that the Russians let him in even though they knew Tamarand was radicalized, and the FBI's apparent failure not to monitor the brother after his return. Looking more and more like another case of one agency not telling another what they were doing, and resulting blowback.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Should I Care That No...»Reply #8