Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

suffragette

(12,232 posts)

5. Neither answer seems like good policy to me either

Reply to DirkGently (Reply #2)

Sat Apr 20, 2013, 12:31 PM

Apr 2013

And that speaks to the erosion of basic rights and due process that continues.

It seems to me the direction we are taking is the direction Marshall was arguing against and I am uncomfortable with that.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Thurgood Marshall wrote a strong dissent in the Quarles case [View all] suffragette Apr 2013 OP

Interesting. ProSense Apr 2013 #1

Agree with you that he makes that point suffragette Apr 2013 #3

Well, yes. Miranda is a procedural protection against coercion. DirkGently Apr 2013 #2

It is as much of a reminder for the police as well as those taken into custody. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #4

I agree. That's part of what's "between the lines" in Miranda. DirkGently Apr 2013 #6

Neither answer seems like good policy to me either suffragette Apr 2013 #5