General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: 150,000 SQ.KM of Pacific with Fukushima nuclear material - ‘Remarkable’ amount released in ocean [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)Anyone with a set of eyes can look at the NOAA maps and see for themselves.
Even more important, I also say three out-of-control nuclear reactors, including one that ran on plutonium-uranium mixed oxide fuel, that long ago went into full-blown meltdown and their busted-out containment buildings and surrounding storage facilities spewing radiation into something so big as the Pacific can do great damage to the environment and human life.
And you do not.

See. I kept it simple.
Just for you.

For those interested in learning more about the subject:
DOE-STD-1128-98
Guide of Good Practices for Occupational Radiological Protection in Plutonium Facilities
EXCERPT...
4.2.3 Characteristics of Plutonium Contamination
There are few characteristics of plutonium contamination that are unique. Plutonium
contamination may be in many physical and chemical forms. (See Section 2.0 for the many
potential sources of plutonium contamination from combustion products of a plutonium fire
to radiolytic products from long-term storage.) [font color="red"]The one characteristic that many believe is
unique to plutonium is its ability to migrate with no apparent motive force. Whether from
alpha recoil or some other mechanism, plutonium contamination, if not contained or
removed, will spread relatively rapidly throughout an area.[/font color]
SOURCE PDF: http://www.hss.doe.gov/nuclearsafety/techstds/docs/standard/DOE-STD-1128-2008.pdf
More on what's been reported, re plutonium: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=584287
PS: Thanks for bringing up UFOs. Unlike so many these days, I do like to keep an open mind. It's part of being a Democrat.