Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Hissyspit

(45,790 posts)
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 01:39 AM Apr 2013

How The NRA Impeded The Boston Bomber Investigation [View all]

http://www.nationalmemo.com/how-the-nra-impeded-the-boston-bomber-investigation/

How The NRA Impeded The Boston Bomber Investigation

April 20th, 2013 12:00 am
David Cay Johnston

The intense hunt for the Boston Marathon bombers illustrates another way that the National Rifle Association helps mass murderers — by delaying how quickly they can be identified.

The inability to quickly track the gunpowders in the Boston bombs is due to government policy designed and promoted by the NRA, which has found a way to transform every massacre associated with weapons into an opportunity for the munitions companies that sustain it to sell more guns, gunpowder and bullets.

The price for such delays was put on terrible display Friday morning when the two brothers, who had been caught on video placing the bombs, killed one police officer, wounded another and carjacked a motorist, creating conditions so unsafe that the 7th largest population center in America spent Friday on lockdown.

But for the NRA-backed policy of not putting identifiers known as taggants in gunpowder, law enforcement could have quickly identified the explosives used to make the bombs, tracking them from manufacture to retail sale. That could well have saved the life of Sean Collier, the 26-year-old MIT police officer who was gunned down Thursday night by the fleeing bomb suspects.

Had the suspects in the Boston bombings killed by slipping poison into bottled water or canned food at a factory, or lacing spinach in a field with a deadly chemical, it would have taken only minutes to a few hours to identify exactly where that food was manufactured and how it moved through the food chain. That would have quickly narrowed the search for suspects.

MORE AT LINK[p]
42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Challenge the law on public safety grounds and get an appellate opinion. Loudly Apr 2013 #1
It would make just as much sense if we go to court to outlaw Zombies ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #7
USA v. Clown College of Professors Loudly Apr 2013 #28
Were Zombies involved? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #29
Clowns and their Professors are up against the ropes. Loudly Apr 2013 #30
Is that you or Shares United claiming that? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #31
So it was gunpowder for a fact Riftaxe Apr 2013 #2
What explosive they used has not been announced by law enforcement ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #9
As if the other seven threads were not enough sarisataka Apr 2013 #3
Wow, a Wikipedia article rife with "citation needed" Robb Apr 2013 #8
Good grief... 99Forever Apr 2013 #12
How about the National Academy of Science Report? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #14
LOL Robb Apr 2013 #16
I read it in its entirety when it first came out and reviewed it again recently ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #17
Why doubt the industry's own data, right? Robb Apr 2013 #18
You on duty early sir CreekDog Apr 2013 #21
One does what one can to keep ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #22
You oppose taggants b/c you carry water for the NRA CreekDog Apr 2013 #23
I have said the exact opposite repeatedly...that I have no issue with safe ones ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #25
You posted here that whales were not threatened with extinction, but you think taggins are unsafe? CreekDog Apr 2013 #32
The existing 3M taggants have been demonstrated as unsafe in commercial explosives and propellants ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #33
so you stunk up this thread because you actually support "safe" taggants CreekDog Apr 2013 #34
I brought the technical reality to this topic and demolished the bad fiction ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #35
No, in this thread you snarked and digressed all to mock the idea of using taggants CreekDog Apr 2013 #36
Being concerned for safety is conservative? Then the TX explosion must be your idea of progressive ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #37
You're ashamed of your stance against taggants, that's why you're afraid to state it here CreekDog Apr 2013 #40
Nonsense. I oppose the 3M taggants for safety. Been very clear about that on multiple threads ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #42
It was more educational sarisataka Apr 2013 #27
we need 7 more uponit7771 Apr 2013 #38
Few of them have started out truthful ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #39
If gun powder had it how would it work in a cartridge case? newmember Apr 2013 #4
Testing showed safety problems with the 3M plastic taggants ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #10
This has been pretty well debunked ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #5
It's called Class Evidence. Things like blood type. Robb Apr 2013 #11
Those purchasers are untracked, the containers, unseralized. No practical means ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #13
It is quite frightening that the gun manufacturers are now in charge of malaise Apr 2013 #6
Actually it is a safety thing ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #15
Hardly. The explosives manufacturers fear liability. Robb Apr 2013 #19
There have clearly been demonstrated safety issues with the 3M taggants ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #20
Wow, more of this hysteria? dairydog91 Apr 2013 #24
This is horseshit - they were caught in 4 days, not 4 weeks. nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2013 #26
Well in that time, a police officer was shot and killed by the suspects CreekDog Apr 2013 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How The NRA Impeded The B...