Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)How The NRA Impeded The Boston Bomber Investigation [View all]
http://www.nationalmemo.com/how-the-nra-impeded-the-boston-bomber-investigation/How The NRA Impeded The Boston Bomber Investigation
April 20th, 2013 12:00 am
David Cay Johnston
The intense hunt for the Boston Marathon bombers illustrates another way that the National Rifle Association helps mass murderers by delaying how quickly they can be identified.
The inability to quickly track the gunpowders in the Boston bombs is due to government policy designed and promoted by the NRA, which has found a way to transform every massacre associated with weapons into an opportunity for the munitions companies that sustain it to sell more guns, gunpowder and bullets.
The price for such delays was put on terrible display Friday morning when the two brothers, who had been caught on video placing the bombs, killed one police officer, wounded another and carjacked a motorist, creating conditions so unsafe that the 7th largest population center in America spent Friday on lockdown.
But for the NRA-backed policy of not putting identifiers known as taggants in gunpowder, law enforcement could have quickly identified the explosives used to make the bombs, tracking them from manufacture to retail sale. That could well have saved the life of Sean Collier, the 26-year-old MIT police officer who was gunned down Thursday night by the fleeing bomb suspects.
Had the suspects in the Boston bombings killed by slipping poison into bottled water or canned food at a factory, or lacing spinach in a field with a deadly chemical, it would have taken only minutes to a few hours to identify exactly where that food was manufactured and how it moved through the food chain. That would have quickly narrowed the search for suspects.
MORE AT LINK[p]
42 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It would make just as much sense if we go to court to outlaw Zombies
ProgressiveProfessor
Apr 2013
#7
I read it in its entirety when it first came out and reviewed it again recently
ProgressiveProfessor
Apr 2013
#17
I have said the exact opposite repeatedly...that I have no issue with safe ones
ProgressiveProfessor
Apr 2013
#25
You posted here that whales were not threatened with extinction, but you think taggins are unsafe?
CreekDog
Apr 2013
#32
The existing 3M taggants have been demonstrated as unsafe in commercial explosives and propellants
ProgressiveProfessor
Apr 2013
#33
I brought the technical reality to this topic and demolished the bad fiction
ProgressiveProfessor
Apr 2013
#35
No, in this thread you snarked and digressed all to mock the idea of using taggants
CreekDog
Apr 2013
#36
Being concerned for safety is conservative? Then the TX explosion must be your idea of progressive
ProgressiveProfessor
Apr 2013
#37
You're ashamed of your stance against taggants, that's why you're afraid to state it here
CreekDog
Apr 2013
#40
Nonsense. I oppose the 3M taggants for safety. Been very clear about that on multiple threads
ProgressiveProfessor
Apr 2013
#42
Those purchasers are untracked, the containers, unseralized. No practical means
ProgressiveProfessor
Apr 2013
#13
There have clearly been demonstrated safety issues with the 3M taggants
ProgressiveProfessor
Apr 2013
#20