Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]bread_and_roses
(6,335 posts)25. I know a young woman who has no visible income either ...
... because she can't find a job and her parents support her. She has not done anything criminal - but let's just say she gets picked up because someone who robbed a convenience store looks like her. So she should have no rights because she has no verifiable source of income and "someone else is paying the bills?" Eh? What sort of crazy is that?
So I guess by logical extension the more "verifiable income" one has the more rights one should have? And the less, the less?
Totally amazing what authoritarianism creeps around these days and tries to present itself as "reasonable."
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
53 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You're confused. Miranda applies regardless of citizenship or withholding of information by a
leveymg
Apr 2013
#5
Yet another op advocating the abolishment of due process and constitutional law.
Warren Stupidity
Apr 2013
#7