General Discussion

Robb

(39,665 posts)

16. LOL

Reply to ProgressiveProfessor (Reply #14)

Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:23 AM

Apr 2013

You didn't look to see who provided their data, did you?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How The NRA Impeded The Boston Bomber Investigation [View all] Hissyspit Apr 2013 OP

Challenge the law on public safety grounds and get an appellate opinion. Loudly Apr 2013 #1

It would make just as much sense if we go to court to outlaw Zombies ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #7

USA v. Clown College of Professors Loudly Apr 2013 #28

Were Zombies involved? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #29

Clowns and their Professors are up against the ropes. Loudly Apr 2013 #30

Is that you or Shares United claiming that? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #31

So it was gunpowder for a fact Riftaxe Apr 2013 #2

What explosive they used has not been announced by law enforcement ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #9

As if the other seven threads were not enough sarisataka Apr 2013 #3

Wow, a Wikipedia article rife with "citation needed" Robb Apr 2013 #8

Good grief... 99Forever Apr 2013 #12

How about the National Academy of Science Report? ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #14

LOL Robb Apr 2013 #16

I read it in its entirety when it first came out and reviewed it again recently ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #17

Why doubt the industry's own data, right? Robb Apr 2013 #18

You on duty early sir CreekDog Apr 2013 #21

One does what one can to keep ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #22

You oppose taggants b/c you carry water for the NRA CreekDog Apr 2013 #23

I have said the exact opposite repeatedly...that I have no issue with safe ones ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #25

You posted here that whales were not threatened with extinction, but you think taggins are unsafe? CreekDog Apr 2013 #32

The existing 3M taggants have been demonstrated as unsafe in commercial explosives and propellants ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #33

so you stunk up this thread because you actually support "safe" taggants CreekDog Apr 2013 #34

I brought the technical reality to this topic and demolished the bad fiction ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #35

No, in this thread you snarked and digressed all to mock the idea of using taggants CreekDog Apr 2013 #36

Being concerned for safety is conservative? Then the TX explosion must be your idea of progressive ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #37

You're ashamed of your stance against taggants, that's why you're afraid to state it here CreekDog Apr 2013 #40

Nonsense. I oppose the 3M taggants for safety. Been very clear about that on multiple threads ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #42

It was more educational sarisataka Apr 2013 #27

we need 7 more uponit7771 Apr 2013 #38

Few of them have started out truthful ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #39

If gun powder had it how would it work in a cartridge case? newmember Apr 2013 #4

Testing showed safety problems with the 3M plastic taggants ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #10

This has been pretty well debunked ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #5

It's called Class Evidence. Things like blood type. Robb Apr 2013 #11

Those purchasers are untracked, the containers, unseralized. No practical means ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #13

It is quite frightening that the gun manufacturers are now in charge of malaise Apr 2013 #6

Actually it is a safety thing ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #15

Hardly. The explosives manufacturers fear liability. Robb Apr 2013 #19

There have clearly been demonstrated safety issues with the 3M taggants ProgressiveProfessor Apr 2013 #20

Wow, more of this hysteria? dairydog91 Apr 2013 #24

This is horseshit - they were caught in 4 days, not 4 weeks. nt Dreamer Tatum Apr 2013 #26

Well in that time, a police officer was shot and killed by the suspects CreekDog Apr 2013 #41