Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
22. Yeah, thanks for calling me names.
Sun Apr 21, 2013, 10:21 PM
Apr 2013

I appreciate it.


I mean, if you knew me, you would know that I actually proposed a comprehensive nationwide background check program that I finalized in the wake of Newtown... which incidentally is about 20 miles from me. And my son is in second grade.

But doubtless you want to hear what my plan is so you can call me an NRA shill some more.

My plan goes like this:

The ATF creates a federal firearm transfer agent license for people that want to have a side business transferring firearms from a private seller to a private buyer.

The transfer agent would not be a stocking gun dealer and would not be able to purchase new-manufacture guns, but they would have all the appropriate forms as well as access to the federal background check system (NICS).

For, say $20, the buyer and the seller would meet with the transfer agent. The transfer agent instructs them to fill out the paperwork, checks and copies identification, then runs the background check on the buyer. If he or she passes the check, the gun is transferred.

To protect privacy, the gun's make, model, and serial number would be recorded with the ATF, as well as the seller and the transfer agent... but not the buyer. That would be held by the transfer agent. If the gun turns up in a police investigation, it would be a relatively simple and quick matter for the police to contact the transfer agent or the seller and find out who it was sold to, but it would keep the government from trolling through a digitized database of gun owners.

This system could and should be used to limit firearm purchases or sales to 12 (or some other number) per year. If a person is selling more than 12 (or whatever) guns per year, then they really need to get a regular federal license and pay taxes on their income. And if they're buying more than 12 (or whatever) guns a year, they should get either a regular federal license or a collector's license.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'd love to show them my idea of any "owed" apology. hlthe2b Apr 2013 #1
Aw, poor billh58 Apr 2013 #2
I'd go further: gun dealers and makers know damn well that they derive considerable income alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #3
I guess calling them douchebag merchants of death would be a bit much too CBGLuthier Apr 2013 #4
Let's see Politicalboi Apr 2013 #5
Wow, that would really piss me off, too. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #6
Yea. How dare he utter the truth! The Wielding Truth Apr 2013 #11
My reply jehop61 Apr 2013 #7
This is the apology I would give them dsc Apr 2013 #8
Screw gun profiteers. Hoyt Apr 2013 #9
My response to the gun industry would be... louis-t Apr 2013 #10
Call the Waaaaahmbulance! truebluegreen Apr 2013 #12
+1 fuck the NRA! Initech Apr 2013 #30
"A HOSTILE CLIMATE FOR THEIR INDUSTRY"!?!?!?! annabanana Apr 2013 #13
Yeah, that's rich, isn't it? smirkymonkey Apr 2013 #21
Gun makers don't need to sell to "everybody" krispos42 Apr 2013 #14
And yet another billh58 Apr 2013 #17
Yeah, thanks for calling me names. krispos42 Apr 2013 #22
Did an NRA attorney billh58 Apr 2013 #23
If they did... krispos42 Apr 2013 #24
The mean old government billh58 Apr 2013 #25
A jury voted 6-0 to Leave it Alone Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #27
Thanks for the update. billh58 Apr 2013 #28
You're most welcome.... Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #29
Ammuntion has been scarce because of fear-mongering of a Black guy in the White House. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #18
+1000 ellisonz Apr 2013 #32
The NSSF has a history of distributing gun locks free of charge to anyone who needs one derby378 Apr 2013 #15
Oh, dear. They're offended. TheCowsCameHome Apr 2013 #16
well they can leave go somewhere else. TX for example. littlewolf Apr 2013 #19
Thanks for a great idea! billh58 Apr 2013 #33
"You want an apology? FUCK YOU! How's that for an apology?" baldguy Apr 2013 #20
I love The Onion. Iggo Apr 2013 #26
The governor is correct. It's about the bottom line for corporations. neverforget Apr 2013 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Connecticut gun makers de...»Reply #22