Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Bomber prediction [View all]
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
44. Persistent aren't you?
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 03:51 AM
Apr 2013

Yes, I have been practicing radical self-reflection for decades.

There is no 'fallacy' in my 'worldview'. I strive to understand, accept, & deal with reality as it actually is. Words and their correct meanings are one such way to accomplish this.

A 'lone wolf' is a terrorist without a group or command structure. Period. It doesn't matter if 'common understandings' are employed. McVeigh? Yes, a lone wolf. DC Snipers? Yes, lone wolves. These two brothers in Boston? Unless new information shows they were actually a part of a cell, then yes, they were lone wolves as well.

Despite any agendas about discrimination, racism, etc., the correct definition allows for a better chance of experiencing reality without bias.

As this does seem to be challenging your worldview, let me give you one more recent example.

Shelter in place.

http://www.ready.gov/shelter

It covers a wide range of reasons to do so - biological or chemical terrorist attacks, weather events, and other dangers to public safety (oh, like perhaps a fugitive with grenades, guns, and possibly wearing an explosive vest running through a residential neighborhood fleeing the police).

It does not mean 'martial law'. It is not 'involuntary'. No one will be 'arrested'. They will not be 'denied their civil rights'. It is not a 'lock down'. It does not matter if the media says it is. It does not matter if that is a common understanding of the term. It just isn't so. To attempt to make it so reveals the numerous, yes, agendas that individuals had and have on these forums about authority, the police, the government, terrorism, etc.

Do you see where I am coming from now and what point I am making? If not, fine, let's just drop this.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bomber prediction [View all] SHRED Apr 2013 OP
How could someone who does something like that NOT be deranged and mentally ill? slackmaster Apr 2013 #1
Yes, but a white guy won't likely be called a "terrorist", even if he is get the red out Apr 2013 #2
So what? A horrible crime was committed. The person or people who did it will probaby get caught. slackmaster Apr 2013 #3
I makes a difference get the red out Apr 2013 #6
You are very worried about something that has not yet happened, and might not happen. slackmaster Apr 2013 #8
Just responding to the OP get the red out Apr 2013 #12
It *does* happen, it will likely happen in this case Cal Carpenter Apr 2013 #17
We don't go to war if we call them deranged loner white Christians. FuzzyRabbit Apr 2013 #54
Ask that of the 99.99999999% of US Muslims who are law abiding kestrel91316 Apr 2013 #55
Regardless of how the media reports it, he is a terrorist whether he is homegrown or international bushisanidiot Apr 2013 #18
People are often negatively biased toward those who are "different" Zambero Apr 2013 #11
Someone who plants bombs to injure and kill people is very different from me. slackmaster Apr 2013 #13
Tell that to the vast majority of Arabic or Islamic people on this planet. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #25
Do a site search of ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2013 #29
Oh, I know what he is already. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #34
Of course it doesn't...but the MEDIA BlueToTheBone Apr 2013 #21
Of course, McVeigh was labeled a Terrorist. TM99 Apr 2013 #23
Lone wolf sounds much more romantic BlueToTheBone Apr 2013 #27
Romantic sounding or not TM99 Apr 2013 #31
That's an interesting tid-bit ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2013 #28
So in other word, TM99 Apr 2013 #30
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2013 #35
Facts rarely drive an agenda. TM99 Apr 2013 #36
Should have stopped reading at ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2013 #37
Sorry TM99 Apr 2013 #39
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2013 #40
Look in the mirror instead. NT TM99 Apr 2013 #42
I do so ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2013 #43
Persistent aren't you? TM99 Apr 2013 #44
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2013 #45
Easy to point out TM99 Apr 2013 #46
Thank you for your pyscho-analysis ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2013 #48
Do I have the faintest idea? TM99 Apr 2013 #49
It must be true ... 1StrongBlackMan Apr 2013 #50
My prediction is that it's not a 'lone' bomber and Faux pas Apr 2013 #4
Timothy McVeigh was not labelled deranged. Puzzledtraveller Apr 2013 #5
I think you're right MrBig Apr 2013 #10
and he was executed. Puzzledtraveller Apr 2013 #14
No he wasn't because TM99 Apr 2013 #22
The bomb has had its expected result egold2604 Apr 2013 #7
News flash: The bomber was already labelled as deranged and mentally ill HereSince1628 Apr 2013 #9
It only matters if President Obama uses the word "terrorist" LibertyLover Apr 2013 #15
Yep, that's always how it is. bushisanidiot Apr 2013 #16
They are looking for 2 bombers, kenny blankenship Apr 2013 #19
What if they are Republicans? Coyotl Apr 2013 #20
Too Soft 4Q2u2 Apr 2013 #24
What if he is Korean? Mnpaul Apr 2013 #26
Get ready for the draft Renew Deal Apr 2013 #32
A blogger I read did this thought experiment after Virginia Tech Recursion Apr 2013 #33
Well. Wrong. Heard Caucasian and terrorist thousand times over. Zax2me Apr 2013 #38
Kudos for not self-deleting, even though your prediction turned out to be wrong (nt) Nye Bevan Apr 2013 #41
Eh, he left one word out, Christian Fumesucker Apr 2013 #47
ROFL malaise Apr 2013 #51
And how can you be more Caucasian than being from the Caucasus ;) dkf Apr 2013 #52
You were right treestar Apr 2013 #53
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bomber prediction»Reply #44