Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Obama Proposal Gives Americans A Pathway Back to Work [View all]
Obama Proposal Gives Americans A Pathway Back to Work
By Sarah Baron, Guest Blogger
President Obamas 2014 budget may have agitated many on both ends of the political spectrum, but the inclusion of the Pathways Back to Work Fund deserves more praise and attention. As millions of Americans are at great risk of being left behind as the economy recovers from the Great Recession, this proposal creates opportunities for jobs for the long-term unemployed and youth whove been hit hardest by the downturn.
The Fund includes three distinct parts: $8 billion for subsidized employment opportunities low-income and long-term unemployed adults; $2.5 billion for summer and year-round employment opportunities for low-income youth between the ages of 16 and 24; and $2 billion for innovative training and employment strategies such as on-the-job training.
Obama originally included the fund in the American Jobs Act, which Republicans blocked in 2011. Currently 4.7 million workers have been unemployed for at least 6 months, and studies show that workers who have been unemployed for long periods find it increasingly difficult to find jobs again. 16.2% of Americans between the ages of 16 and 24 are unemployed, double the national rate of unemployment. 6.7 million youth are neither employed nor in school, and unless we intentionally connect unemployed youth to jobs, youth and young adults wont gain skills or earn enough to support their families, to the detriment of the countrys long-term economic growth and competitiveness.
Subsidized and transitional jobs and work-based employment have a proven track record of re-engaging the workforce as well as increasing personal and family income and directly benefiting employers. This fund also builds on the success of the 2009 federal investments in job creation that put more than half a million youth and adults to work in that year alone.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/22/1901551/obama-pathway-back-to-work-fund/
By Sarah Baron, Guest Blogger
President Obamas 2014 budget may have agitated many on both ends of the political spectrum, but the inclusion of the Pathways Back to Work Fund deserves more praise and attention. As millions of Americans are at great risk of being left behind as the economy recovers from the Great Recession, this proposal creates opportunities for jobs for the long-term unemployed and youth whove been hit hardest by the downturn.
The Fund includes three distinct parts: $8 billion for subsidized employment opportunities low-income and long-term unemployed adults; $2.5 billion for summer and year-round employment opportunities for low-income youth between the ages of 16 and 24; and $2 billion for innovative training and employment strategies such as on-the-job training.
Obama originally included the fund in the American Jobs Act, which Republicans blocked in 2011. Currently 4.7 million workers have been unemployed for at least 6 months, and studies show that workers who have been unemployed for long periods find it increasingly difficult to find jobs again. 16.2% of Americans between the ages of 16 and 24 are unemployed, double the national rate of unemployment. 6.7 million youth are neither employed nor in school, and unless we intentionally connect unemployed youth to jobs, youth and young adults wont gain skills or earn enough to support their families, to the detriment of the countrys long-term economic growth and competitiveness.
Subsidized and transitional jobs and work-based employment have a proven track record of re-engaging the workforce as well as increasing personal and family income and directly benefiting employers. This fund also builds on the success of the 2009 federal investments in job creation that put more than half a million youth and adults to work in that year alone.
- more -
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2013/04/22/1901551/obama-pathway-back-to-work-fund/
Ah, what could have been without Republican belligerence.
The Jobs Program That Wasnt
Macroeconomic Advisers on the American Jobs Act, proposed a year ago:
Of course, it that had happened, Obama would be more or less a lock for reelection. Instead, having blocked the presidents economic plans, Republicans can point to weak job growth and claim that the presidents policies have failed.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/08/the-jobs-program-that-wasnt/
Macroeconomic Advisers on the American Jobs Act, proposed a year ago:
We estimate that the American Jobs Act (AJA), if enacted, would give a significant boost to GDP and employment over the near-term.
-The various tax cuts aimed at raising workers after-tax income and encouraging hiring and investing, combined with the spending increases aimed at maintaining state & local employment and funding infrastructure modernization, would:
-Boost the level of GDP by 1.3% by the end of 2012, and by 0.2% by the end of 2013.
-Raise nonfarm establishment employment by 1.3 million by the end of 2012 and 0.8 million by the end of 2013, relative to the baseline
Of course, it that had happened, Obama would be more or less a lock for reelection. Instead, having blocked the presidents economic plans, Republicans can point to weak job growth and claim that the presidents policies have failed.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/09/08/the-jobs-program-that-wasnt/
In Obamas Budget, Poverty Initiatives Face an Uphill Battle
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022674502
President's budget: Maintains Strong Support for Worker Protection.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022673679
President's budget: Excellent proposals that Congress should support.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022670043
29 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
My problem now is that I have been told that Obama proposes things knowing the GOP
djean111
Apr 2013
#1
So the POTUS shouldn't put forth his vision because "he knows the GOP won't pass em"?
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2013
#3
Well, if you're as outraged as you appear to be, why aren't you organizing a march on the Capitol?
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2013
#11
About as effective as scorn. And not outraged, disappointed - as if it matters.
djean111
Apr 2013
#13
If you can't afford gas, then it sounds like you would qualify for special exemptions re: CPI.
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2013
#14
I am working on my own march. Planning on relocating to Sweden or Japan. Soon as my
Katashi_itto
Apr 2013
#27
Adjö´ så lä´nge! or should I say Sayonara? Plenty to take your place, just ask ICE.
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2013
#29
"Is that going to prevent you from pushing Congress to pass a proposal that will help people?"
Tarheel_Dem
Apr 2013
#16
Or he could just stop pushing anti-worker trade deals like the TPP that will export
forestpath
Apr 2013
#15