Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,703 posts)
20. I don't have to assume anything...
Mon Apr 22, 2013, 03:02 PM
Apr 2013

... because you were willing to scoff at the notion that there was no threat back when it was just a guy with a gun.

1) the individual is not trained in how to operate the plant.

A pretty safe assumption. But even if not... they need to get past many defenses before that's even relevant.

2) they are alone.

A dozen guys with handguns wouldn't be much more of a threat. See below - but one guy taking pot shots hundreds of feet from the fence makes it less likely that there's a group of terrorists in the bushes.

3) the operators will not co-operate with the gunman under threat of execution.

Would you put a grenade up to your neck and pull the pin if someone held a gun to your head and threatened you? But no... I don't need to assume that because they can't get to the operators to threaten them.

but to say there is NO threat is a misstatement.

Nope. By that logic, a ladybug is a threat because there might be a guy with a backpack nuke behind the ladybug. The ladybug still isn't a threat. If you want to imagine 100 Spetznaz commandos hiding in the woods with 100 Navy Seals who have gone rogue while this guy takes pot shots an individual guard... fine. But he is still no threat to the reactor.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

"adequate" really doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling ... Myrina Apr 2013 #1
My thought exactly, but WTF? Was that one person doing advance work for a real attack? Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #2
No... a person with a gun does not present any danger to a reactor. FBaggins Apr 2013 #3
Agreed. But who knows what else this individual or individuals were up to! grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #6
"Some level of threat" to other people... FBaggins Apr 2013 #7
The monument can not melt down by simply shutting down its cooling systems, the reactor can. grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #10
You don't shut down a cooling system by flipping a switch NickB79 Apr 2013 #11
A guy with a gun can't "shut down the cooling system" FBaggins Apr 2013 #12
Your assuming 1) the individual is not trained in how to operate the plant. grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #15
I don't have to assume anything... FBaggins Apr 2013 #20
If it were that frigging easy, terrorists would have taken over years ago. TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #4
That's why the terror threat has been so obviously over-hyped. However, ALL grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #8
Fertiliser bomb iin a boat still won't do it. IIRC those places are hardened... TheMadMonk Apr 2013 #24
And what, exactly, do you think "a person with a gun" ... oldhippie Apr 2013 #5
It's what he represents, he got away. There is some threat to the reactor when a grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #9
Realistically? SWAT storms the reactor and restarts the cooling system NickB79 Apr 2013 #13
I'll disagree there. FBaggins Apr 2013 #16
Which is at least some level of threat to the reactor. grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #17
How does he "shoot his way in there"? FBaggins Apr 2013 #14
Exactly. One does not "shoot their way into" ...... oldhippie Apr 2013 #21
What worries me is the cavalier attitude, grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #29
Piffle! I laugh away ..... oldhippie Apr 2013 #18
BS. I have been in too many. grahamhgreen Apr 2013 #26
After a certain point hypothetical scenarios are a little too absurd. (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2013 #28
Reconnaissance. Tom Rinaldo Apr 2013 #19
Pretty unlikely FBaggins Apr 2013 #22
well, if that was an unusual event onethatcares Apr 2013 #23
The reactor is contained within a concrete containment building. NutmegYankee Apr 2013 #25
I should hope that constitutes an "unusual event." (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2013 #27
Tennessee has a Nuke Event SidDithers Apr 2013 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Gunman Sought After Shoot...»Reply #20