Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

derby378

(30,262 posts)

10. Why not use a more unbiased group of statistics?

Reply to Tx4obama (Original post)

Mon Apr 22, 2013, 07:53 PM

Apr 2013

What are the folks at the DoJ doing on their computers all day? Playing Farmville? They're crunching numbers, too, but their numbers are more fair and impartial than VPC's.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Guns are Rarely Used to Kill Criminals or Stop Crimes New VPC Analysis Reveals [View all] Tx4obama Apr 2013 OP

I dunno? 237,000 defensive uses of firearms? Recursion Apr 2013 #1

Good analysis badtoworse Apr 2013 #2

That's under the assumption that "defensive gun uses" are actually socially beneficial. DanTex Apr 2013 #4

Which is as silly as assuming the only defensive uses are "justifiable homicides" Recursion Apr 2013 #6

An interesting sidenote, since I didn't actually claim that the only defensive uses are "justifiable DanTex Apr 2013 #7

So WILDLY Wrong it's laughable. Alva Goldbook Apr 2013 #3

LOL. NRA talking points strike again! DanTex Apr 2013 #5

Are there any truly unbiased studies on this? Stretch714 Apr 2013 #8

sometimes the truth is biased noiretextatique Apr 2013 #9

Why not use a more unbiased group of statistics? derby378 Apr 2013 #10