Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kool! NYC city council aims to raise smoking age from 18 to 21! [View all]HiPointDem
(20,729 posts)31. what a bunch of stupid fucks. no, not stupid -- fascist. criminalizing tobacco
= more kids with records for the prison to profit pipeteers and the surveillance capitalists.
fuck them all
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
118 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kool! NYC city council aims to raise smoking age from 18 to 21! [View all]
graham4anything
Apr 2013
OP
I hope Christine Quinn sets double history and becomes Mayor this Nov. and
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#1
Not counting the Hillary word salad, you really have a strong authoritarian streak.
hobbit709
Apr 2013
#6
Guess you would let George Bailey drown. Sorry Clarence no wings served here
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#10
I ask again, what are you on? Jefferson was NOT a fictional character, no matter what he said.
hobbit709
Apr 2013
#68
You have a really strong pro-corporate streak. Smoking only benefits big tobacco, has no redeeming
stevenleser
Apr 2013
#73
I got there because you are behaving as a willing patsy for big tobacco. Thats who you are helping
stevenleser
Apr 2013
#79
Yes, even the high and mighty you are capable of behaving like a corporate patsy
stevenleser
Apr 2013
#82
His supposed "freedom of choice" is the freedom to enrich big tobacco by becoming addicted
stevenleser
Apr 2013
#87
I'm not sure "It's makes a corporate profit ergo it should be banned" is a basis for sound policy.
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#104
guess some would tell George Bailey to drown instead of having Clarence save him.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#4
That still doesn't give you the right to tell others how to live according to your attitudes.
hobbit709
Apr 2013
#17
I have no power, therefore, I am just giving an opinion on a chat board. Does it bother you?
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#18
Most would take PATH a short ride at low fare. You know this, because you live in NJ.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#78
If the council, the democratic party and the mayor want it, who is going to stop it?
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#20
There should be a modern day version of a Stephen King short story.Quitter's Inc.(c)
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#28
If they don't have health insurance, it costs everybody,making it everybodies biz.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#57
As opposed to someone fighting to keep big tobacco raking in the profits at the expense of death and
stevenleser
Apr 2013
#74
This is for the tourists. NYers already don't smoke much. This is for the tourists.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#39
They are our guests. They can't smoke in hotel rooms you know. NONE of them.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#59
'Our guests'? You live in NJ, where hotels can and do allow smoking in up to 20% of rooms
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#96
According to NYC, 14.2% of residents are smokers, that's 1,170,777 smoking NYers
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#91
what a bunch of stupid fucks. no, not stupid -- fascist. criminalizing tobacco
HiPointDem
Apr 2013
#31
So are you against the democratic rep. that this bill was brought forth by?
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#34
It's the sellers who would have the legal problems that would tend to put them in prison.
Sunlei
Apr 2013
#38
it's all part of criminalizing someone, and more state intrusion into lots of things.
HiPointDem
Apr 2013
#44
Thats probably a good idea for drinking aswell. And the military for the combat part should be 21.
Sunlei
Apr 2013
#32
That's federal. This is local. (or state). In America they are separate parts.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#36
yes, I wish 21 was a federal law instead of having some states stay in the dark ages another decade.
Sunlei
Apr 2013
#42
Now. Lifetime New Yorker. Major John Lindsay fan. Like Bloomberg, JVL had many haters
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#106
Is there any authoritarian action in this country that you're not in favor of?
MadHound
Apr 2013
#62