Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Why Can't We See That Boston Is More Like Newtown Than 9/11? [View all]
Why Can't We See That Boston Is More Like Newtown Than 9/11?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/peter-alexander-meyers/boston-terrorism-newtown-shooting_b_3139500.html
A week of intense and rapid events in Boston. We are saturated after a flood of words and images. A clear description of what happened is emerging. White hat. Black hat. Two loaded bags infiltrated into the crowd. Boom. And again. Suspects on the run. One dead, the other captured. Beyond bare bones the detail, its sheer quantity, is uncanny. And still these chaotic and riveting scenes, where do they take us?
A bomb in the streets of Boston is something new. We judge the new by what we know. Only by saying what it looks like can we understand what it is. And it is from there -- appearance and belief -- that our reactions will, for good or for ill, take their course. That is why pretty much everything depends on what we see when we look at the screen. At that crossroads words and images catalyze and explode.
However charged with meaning, pictures do not speak for themselves. From shock to fear to terror. The story-machine of imagination stretches out from the image. It's the words and the wordsmiths that over and over tutor interpretation. That's what builds the doors and gateways of the public sphere, that's where choice chooses and action moves us.
......
A bomb in the streets of Boston is something new. We judge the new by what we know. Only by saying what it looks like can we understand what it is. And it is from there -- appearance and belief -- that our reactions will, for good or for ill, take their course. That is why pretty much everything depends on what we see when we look at the screen. At that crossroads words and images catalyze and explode.
However charged with meaning, pictures do not speak for themselves. From shock to fear to terror. The story-machine of imagination stretches out from the image. It's the words and the wordsmiths that over and over tutor interpretation. That's what builds the doors and gateways of the public sphere, that's where choice chooses and action moves us.
......
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If religion is the key to that, then let's ask what is the difference between
sinkingfeeling
Apr 2013
#21
I don't think those terms were floating around then, but in theory he should have been
snooper2
Apr 2013
#28
My definition of sane is "not the basis for our legal system or general morality"
marions ghost
Apr 2013
#55
Ok. It doesn't make sense to you. I explained it, you disagree. I'm fine with that.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2013
#8
That is one of the most disgusting bits of moral relativism I've ever read anywhere.
Skidmore
Apr 2013
#5
I said precisely what I meant, and I stand by it without further explanation.
Buzz Clik
Apr 2013
#16
I agree with you. Its totally different to stare at a 5 yr old child down the barrel of a gun
stevenleser
Apr 2013
#19
The Boston bombers stared right into Jeff Bauman's eyes and placed the bag.
riderinthestorm
Apr 2013
#31
Because it isn't. Boston was an attack because of hatred for Americans and their
still_one
Apr 2013
#48