Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
26. Dude, this is what "our side" has been saying all along
Tue Apr 23, 2013, 06:08 PM
Apr 2013

Get law enforcement out there and actually enforce the firearms restrictions we have put in place over the past century or so.

This is a good thing. I hope it goes well.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

a good start bowens43 Apr 2013 #1
While this seems like a pretty good idea ...... oldhippie Apr 2013 #2
So it's a good plan, but you think they want too much money for it? Robb Apr 2013 #3
I didn't say it was too much money ...... oldhippie Apr 2013 #5
So they didn't evaluate this plan rationally? Yet you approve? Robb Apr 2013 #7
Do you not understand the use of ..... oldhippie Apr 2013 #13
The money being used is coming from a special account which is funded by a fee on petronius Apr 2013 #9
Thank you. nt oldhippie Apr 2013 #16
Good job Gov. Brown! CountAllVotes Apr 2013 #4
Not a bad idea NickB79 Apr 2013 #6
This is good pipoman Apr 2013 #8
So you think it's a good idea, but that the timing indicates nefarious intent. Robb Apr 2013 #10
Any idea pipoman Apr 2013 #15
LOL Robb Apr 2013 #17
Yeah, that's what I thought.. pipoman Apr 2013 #18
... Robb Apr 2013 #19
Quick alert the Glenn Beck!!!! Rex Apr 2013 #11
Enforcing the laws that already exist? That's silliness! Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2013 #12
Won't happen newmember Apr 2013 #14
How do they know who owns what weapons? sandmann Apr 2013 #20
Handguns are (theoretically) registered in CA Recursion Apr 2013 #28
I'll be interested to see how this unfolds Recursion Apr 2013 #21
The program's more than a decade old. Robb Apr 2013 #22
Right, I'm hoping this expansion goes well Recursion Apr 2013 #23
Sure. Robb Apr 2013 #24
Dude, this is what "our side" has been saying all along Recursion Apr 2013 #26
$3 million for 700 people is ~$4200/person NickB79 Apr 2013 #25
They don't need to; they just need to be getting more than are created every day. Robb Apr 2013 #30
Why should they have to double the number of agents, or anything else? They already have a list Ghost in the Machine Apr 2013 #32
There are currently 33 agents assigned to cover the entire state of California. Robb Apr 2013 #33
I think you missed what I was trying to say... Why does it have to be just these 33 agents?? Ghost in the Machine Apr 2013 #34
I see. That's an interesting question, I don't know the answer. Robb Apr 2013 #35
There we go. Let's hope other states start following suit. n/t AverageJoe90 Apr 2013 #27
So, in other words, not making new laws but finally enforcing the ones they have in place?? The Straight Story Apr 2013 #29
Gerry Brown is a workaholic olddots Apr 2013 #31
My heart goes out to... bobclark86 Apr 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California to spend $24 m...»Reply #26