Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So, what would you have done differently in Boston [View all]Purveyor
(29,876 posts)77. WOW! Seriously? Progressive forum...indeed! eom
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
132 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
much much less, for a lone, wounded 19yo with no military training
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#10
are you kidding? They dealt with many bombings and NEVER shut down a whole city AND
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#29
You still seem to be saying what NOT to do instead of how to better handle the situation.
randome
Apr 2013
#35
No, I provided an example of how it was better handled, than shutting down a whole major city.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#40
Whole books have been written on the subject, and it is not just some other city
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#45
The British used military patrols even when there was no immediate attack
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#81
Bloomberg Says Interpretation of Constitution Will ‘Have to Change’ After Boston Bombing
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#87
Bloomberg is a jack-ass who is exploiting an attack to force his dictates
Nuclear Unicorn
Apr 2013
#89
we fucking did drills hiding under our elementary school desks during the cold war
onenote
Apr 2013
#88
right, but they didn't lock down the whole city, looking for one person
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#91
WRONG: pursuing a lone, wounded, teenaged terrorist, is even LESS reason to shut down an entire city
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#52
Your example was a highway chase, and you didn't even take a pass at Belfast.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#68
They provided services to the police and the national guard and probably the FBI, too.
randome
Apr 2013
#14
Ah, no. You left out the part where after the bombs days past and the pursuit only
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#53
LOL, I guess you forgot many of them don't mind dying. Read some stories about it. n-t
Logical
Apr 2013
#61
Yeah, but that's not at all what you said, and those two sure seemed to mind.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#71
OK, you are right. Terrorists never plan on dying or getting caught. My bad. n-t
Logical
Apr 2013
#73
Wow, almost like terrorists who plan on dying. Good point. Except these idiots also.....
Logical
Apr 2013
#65
No, one person shutting down a major US city for a day is silly no matter the age. n-t
Logical
Apr 2013
#92
I still think that discovering the suspect was more luck than skill
customerserviceguy
Apr 2013
#131
Nothing says "Terrorists Win!" like shutting down a whole city for a missing 19 year old. n-t
Logical
Apr 2013
#13
Yes, "Missing", "On the loose", "Escaped", Etc. Like the DC Snipers or escaped prisoners. n-t
Logical
Apr 2013
#98
see very first post: did they shut london down during the IRA bombings?
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#16
London is just one example, there are many many more, shutting down a MAJOR U.S. for 1 wounded teen
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#37
I was there in London once when the IRA set off a bomb near Harrods Dept. Store
treestar
Apr 2013
#93
don't try to recreate the conditions the Palestinians unfortunately have to live under in the U.S.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#33
My point is simple, lets not get hysterical over a lone, wounded, teen terrorist.
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#42
There was never a pursuit of an escapcing bomber in London. Did Boston shut down the day
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#63
Your example is of a highway chase far away from London, on highways. A car chase.
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#74
I have read at least two answers, and I haven't finished reading the thread. nt
ZombieHorde
Apr 2013
#126
I'm a bit puzzled why the entire city of Boston was given the shelter-in-place
Gormy Cuss
Apr 2013
#25
I'm sure many people would normally travel INTO the shelter-in-place area. Perhaps that's why.
randome
Apr 2013
#28
Not talking about them. There are many who travel wholly outside of the area.
Gormy Cuss
Apr 2013
#43
these procedures are not new, and have been routinely followed during many simular events
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Apr 2013
#46
Shut the media off, do not allow them to be right there following it breathlessly 24 hr/day
uppityperson
Apr 2013
#48
I would like news to actually cover news, not breathless speculation. If that makes me
uppityperson
Apr 2013
#78
In 'my eyes' you are. Practice your 'goosestep' but I hear is it hell on your back. eom
Purveyor
Apr 2013
#79
I don't watch 'tv' movies but the fact that you do explains much... I'm finished with this thread.
Purveyor
Apr 2013
#82
OMG, assume much? I walked in on friends watching it back in 1980's. It is about how media
uppityperson
Apr 2013
#86
It was quite the movie and greatly impressing. Too bad you are more concerned with snarking than
uppityperson
Apr 2013
#122
Made the perimeter a little bigger, he was actually hiding OUTSIDE THE SEARCH AREA...
winstars
Apr 2013
#50
Well, see, I'm not one much for doing anything, but I will complain about the ones who are.
TheManInTheMac
Apr 2013
#102
Thanks for asking that, Raven. I have not seen a good answer yet, so will peruse this thread eagerly
Hekate
Apr 2013
#104
I think they did the best they could, and some things could have been done differently.
Renew Deal
Apr 2013
#107