General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: A Progressive Forum should never advocate the Death Penalty. [View all]LostOne4Ever
(9,752 posts)Be accepting and open minded of a differences of opinions. Very few progressive are 100% in agreement with progressive philosophy, but rather are a gestalt sum of their beliefs.
Im against the death penalty too, but I can accept a difference of Opinion. Some of my favorite politicians have been for the Death Penalty including Bill Clinton and Obama. Should I not mention them because they deviate from one line of philosophy?
According to that overly simplistic political compass test im an a perfect social liberal and left of center on economic issues. Should I not post on economics then? What if someone is pro-universal single payer healthcare, pro-choice, pro-environment, pro-gay marriage, pro-income equality, pro-diplomocy, pro-equal rights, pro-animal rights, anti-monopoly, anti-corruption, anti-racism yet also pro-death penalty? Just because of that one issue they have to check their progressive card?
I would expect a progressive forum and the progressives posting there would not enforce a strict test of philosophical dogma, and would allow a few dissenting opinions here and there. I would also expect said forum to have most people argue and support progressive and liberal positions. To use logic and reason tempered with compassion to try and convince them to change their mind. That is what I have been seeing. You even admit that most members on this forum don't support the Death penalty.
So whats the problem?