Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
9. With less guns - and more importantly, less folks attracted to guns - rate would be even less. n/t
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 07:24 AM
Apr 2013

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K&R liberal N proud Apr 2013 #1
right wing "science" is anything but sigmasix Apr 2013 #2
I don't find this surprising. In a room with 100 guns and 100 people geckosfeet Apr 2013 #3
"Given that you can't get rid of the guns." Robb Apr 2013 #4
You can't. So forget about it. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #49
They did it in the UK. They did it in Australia. baldguy Apr 2013 #5
So you will ban some guns to save 200 lives but not ban other types of guns to save 30,000? hack89 Apr 2013 #8
OK. baldguy Apr 2013 #16
You specifically said you were not going to ban handguns but wanted to ban assault weapons. hack89 Apr 2013 #22
They also banned PIT BULLS in the UK..because they are dangerous. Boudica the Lyoness Apr 2013 #38
Non sequiturs don't help your argument. baldguy Apr 2013 #41
Ignorance of pit bulls? Boudica the Lyoness Apr 2013 #56
Yes, it is a different culture. nt Mojorabbit Apr 2013 #51
gun buybacks in the communities where people are nettlesome Kolesar Apr 2013 #6
Sorry - been at work all day. But here is a serious answer to your question. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #48
^rambling speculations Kolesar Apr 2013 #70
Guess I am just a rambler. Thanks for taking my views seriously. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #71
Well, if you look at the stats 2/3rds of the deaths would be self inflicted snooper2 Apr 2013 #42
Yes. Suicide or negligence. Both preventable with training and/or health care in most cases. geckosfeet Apr 2013 #50
America has cut it's homicide rate in half in the past 30 years hack89 Apr 2013 #7
With less guns - and more importantly, less folks attracted to guns - rate would be even less. n/t Hoyt Apr 2013 #9
That doesn't alter the reality hack89 pointed out NickB79 Apr 2013 #58
hack89, again, is fond of the death statistics, but ignores the reality of bullets and hospitals. Robb Apr 2013 #67
Gun ownership has actually dropped significantly in the last 20 years. DanTex Apr 2013 #10
But our non-gun homicide rate is higher too hack89 Apr 2013 #12
No it isn't. DanTex Apr 2013 #14
"our murder rate is not falling fast enough" Kolesar Apr 2013 #11
Considering our suicide rate is twice that of our murder rate hack89 Apr 2013 #13
Everyone here I think will agree that we have a long way to go with mental health policy. DanTex Apr 2013 #15
But there is more support for mental health policy hack89 Apr 2013 #19
I don't know about more support. DanTex Apr 2013 #25
But I am not against gun control hack89 Apr 2013 #26
Yes, but you keep chiming in about how gun violence is "really not that bad". DanTex Apr 2013 #28
Don't put words in my mouth hack89 Apr 2013 #29
That gun violence is concentrated among the urban poor doesn't make it any less of a problem. DanTex Apr 2013 #30
So lets focus our solutions on racism, poverty, homelessness hack89 Apr 2013 #31
And on guns. DanTex Apr 2013 #32
Sure hack89 Apr 2013 #33
. baldguy Apr 2013 #17
I don't believe that more guns resulted in fewer murders. hack89 Apr 2013 #20
Number of Guns vs Gun Ownership ThoughtCriminal Apr 2013 #44
But the number of households has also increased hack89 Apr 2013 #46
Nope ThoughtCriminal Apr 2013 #52
Ok - interesting stuff. nt hack89 Apr 2013 #54
You've got to factor in advances in medical technology. Tommy_Carcetti Apr 2013 #45
Look at my first link - look at aggravated assaults hack89 Apr 2013 #47
You admitted gun ownership decreased homicide in the G20 Recursion Apr 2013 #18
We've been over this. The G20 does not select for high human development or per capita GDP. DanTex Apr 2013 #21
You have ignored the countries with low firearms ownership and high homicides Recursion Apr 2013 #24
I have ignored countries that are not first-world democracies. DanTex Apr 2013 #27
I can hear the crickets from here. Robb Apr 2013 #35
I don't know about you, but the first thing that comes to mind for an international comparison DanTex Apr 2013 #36
Ouch...that's going to leave a mark alcibiades_mystery Apr 2013 #40
K&R BlueCaliDem Apr 2013 #23
The homicide rate is one thing, but... TreasonousBastard Apr 2013 #34
Yes, the survival rate has increased over time DanTex Apr 2013 #37
A-ha! Missed that in maze of stuff in the thread... TreasonousBastard Apr 2013 #39
Very interesting. rrneck Apr 2013 #43
Indeed. It's easy to identify the problem. LAGC Apr 2013 #53
I have one, and it doesn't involve registration, magazine sizes or assault weapons bans XRubicon Apr 2013 #55
actually, we have been since the gejohnston Apr 2013 #57
A high tax, like 75 to 100% XRubicon Apr 2013 #59
It would be unconstitutional hack89 Apr 2013 #60
Nope sorry they did it in 1939 for automatic weapons XRubicon Apr 2013 #61
Handguns are specifically protected hack89 Apr 2013 #62
I think you are confusing rights and taxes... XRubicon Apr 2013 #63
Look up poll taxes. hack89 Apr 2013 #64
Your opinion is not constitutional law XRubicon Apr 2013 #65
ok nt hack89 Apr 2013 #66
rather classist isn't it? gejohnston Apr 2013 #68
I have a problem with the number of guns XRubicon Apr 2013 #69
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Yes, gun ownership does i...»Reply #9