Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
114. I think it's safe to say that sex wasn't the most important thing in that marriage.
Wed Apr 24, 2013, 01:20 PM
Apr 2013

If it were, the marriage probably would not have survived.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is not going to end well. stevenleser Apr 2013 #1
No, and the ride there HappyMe Apr 2013 #3
Nope! liberal N proud Apr 2013 #4
Ohhhhhhh, no it's not . . . . HughBeaumont Apr 2013 #5
Study shows that grumpy, overweight, late-to-come-home men are aphrodisiacs for women Orrex Apr 2013 #2
Was about to post something similar... but without the sarcasm. Fawke Em Apr 2013 #6
You did your own study? snooper2 Apr 2013 #11
Millions of men walking around with that description...not so happy looking though. Ninga Apr 2013 #32
What a crappy article MattBaggins Apr 2013 #7
It sure is a crappy article. Again, man blaming his wife or girlfriend because his southernyankeebelle Apr 2013 #65
Did you read the actual WSJ article? Matt_in_STL Apr 2013 #75
No I just got really upset that women are always getting its their fault attitude about southernyankeebelle Apr 2013 #83
Not a problem Matt_in_STL Apr 2013 #85
I read it. I don't find this particularly thought provoking: Squinch Apr 2013 #127
True, it isn't the best article ever written Matt_in_STL Apr 2013 #132
That's why a therapist doesn't take sides MattBaggins Apr 2013 #86
Well it worked. southernyankeebelle Apr 2013 #96
"Go in the restroom and meet 5 fingers Lucy. " HA! bettyellen Apr 2013 #92
Thanks, I needed a laugh. I knew I would get someone to see the humor. You have southernyankeebelle Apr 2013 #99
The NY Mag article is full of dumb quotes... in reality it seems this poor guy was trying hard bettyellen Apr 2013 #101
I went back and read it. I still think women should think twice if sex is the most southernyankeebelle Apr 2013 #110
I think it's safe to say that sex wasn't the most important thing in that marriage. geek tragedy Apr 2013 #114
Maybe. southernyankeebelle Apr 2013 #118
a coworker says "Palmela Anderson" Skittles Apr 2013 #103
Good one, Skittles! bettyellen Apr 2013 #105
LOL Skittles Apr 2013 #107
Ms. Mower had been turned off by the "pressure" to have sex again after a miscarriage rocktivity Apr 2013 #8
+1 redqueen Apr 2013 #14
Is it possible all the facts are not known MattBaggins Apr 2013 #18
I agree. Part of marriage is working through the periods where the two partners geek tragedy Apr 2013 #21
I really meant the comment about counseling being offered MattBaggins Apr 2013 #27
I'm totally with you on it. There's not much in life that prepares a young married geek tragedy Apr 2013 #30
You know geek...I sometimes think your just not up on things. I am wrong. You're quite Katashi_itto Apr 2013 #78
Thank you in return. nt geek tragedy Apr 2013 #80
+1000... opiate69 Apr 2013 #93
Is it possible that he didn't pressure her for sex? redqueen Apr 2013 #119
I really don't know in this case MattBaggins Apr 2013 #123
I finally read through the thread and realized redqueen Apr 2013 #124
Soooooo....... opiate69 Apr 2013 #126
Yeah, when it comes to male-female dyads there is really only one side to any story. Right? leeroysphitz Apr 2013 #38
"Dyads?" I haven't heard that word rocktivity Apr 2013 #43
Same here. n/t leeroysphitz Apr 2013 #46
Amazingly, that isn't what happened Matt_in_STL Apr 2013 #52
So what did the report say on women that are denyed sex? Rex Apr 2013 #9
Yeah, the problem is that this is set up as a man/woman issue geek tragedy Apr 2013 #16
Yes horrible article, but I expect that kind of crap from the WSJ. Rex Apr 2013 #71
Ironically, the content of the article undermined a lot of gender stereotypes geek tragedy Apr 2013 #76
Maybe that is all sex is to the author. Rex Apr 2013 #82
Report: Denying women money is like child neglect eissa Apr 2013 #10
That's funny. HappyMe Apr 2013 #12
love it. n/t leeroysphitz Apr 2013 #40
Don't forget the $125 dinners, a girl needs to feel fed once in a while. Coyotl Apr 2013 #108
Sex is a part of most healthy marriages? Stop the presses. geek tragedy Apr 2013 #13
Agreed Matt_in_STL Apr 2013 #17
They equated the man's need for sexual intimacy with his wife geek tragedy Apr 2013 #26
I agree. HappyMe Apr 2013 #31
Seriously, switch the genders in this article as a thought experiment. geek tragedy Apr 2013 #33
" Is this (a) implausible and (b) something that would merit insulting and mocking the wife?" leeroysphitz Apr 2013 #45
People are basing their view of it on the shitty NY Mag piece. geek tragedy Apr 2013 #48
Agreed. I just like to jerk my knee in a different direction than everybody else... leeroysphitz Apr 2013 #63
I knew a married couple where the man essentially was disinterested in sex. The marriage imploded stevenleser Apr 2013 #50
It's not at all implausible. HappyMe Apr 2013 #56
I don't know about "insulting and mocking," but it would be her fault for getting fat. Sivafae Apr 2013 #70
Wha? nt geek tragedy Apr 2013 #73
Yes somehow they went from MattBaggins Apr 2013 #23
The WSJ is partly to blame by casting it in the traditional gender stereotypes geek tragedy Apr 2013 #25
I agree with that assessment as well MattBaggins Apr 2013 #36
Ironically, a lot of the commentary has embedded partriarchal stereotypes of men. geek tragedy Apr 2013 #39
C'mon ladies! it's 30 seconds that will really change your life! n2doc Apr 2013 #15
If only it was just 30 seconds eissa Apr 2013 #22
If it only lasts 30 seconds.... HappyMe Apr 2013 #24
30 seconds explains the denial... one_voice Apr 2013 #28
This guy sounds like a child himself n/t arcane1 Apr 2013 #19
no shit. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #51
He sounds like a child MattBaggins Apr 2013 #91
I think when people are in a loving relationship FedUpWithIt All Apr 2013 #20
The selfishness in this thread saddens me joeglow3 Apr 2013 #29
You make a great point Orrex Apr 2013 #34
It's not selfishness, but there's a profound lack of empathy being displayed. geek tragedy Apr 2013 #35
I don't think most people here read the WSJ article Matt_in_STL Apr 2013 #37
Sometimes trying to be clever results in foolishness. nt geek tragedy Apr 2013 #41
And sometimes trying to look insightful results in smug self-righteousness Orrex Apr 2013 #54
You dangerous thinker you MattBaggins Apr 2013 #58
The NY Mag piece was very smug, true. nt geek tragedy Apr 2013 #60
See? We can agree on something. Orrex Apr 2013 #72
That's one interpretation, sure. Orrex Apr 2013 #47
And that number is climbing. n/t leeroysphitz Apr 2013 #59
It was selfish of her to feel so badly about miscarrying rocktivity Apr 2013 #53
Not selfish of her at all MattBaggins Apr 2013 #67
No, she and her husband processed the grief in different ways. geek tragedy Apr 2013 #68
The article doesn't say that at all Matt_in_STL Apr 2013 #69
No one is saying that joeglow3 Apr 2013 #104
If you deny your partner sex, don't be surprised when LittleBlue Apr 2013 #42
Sexual intimacy isn't something that's granted or denied. geek tragedy Apr 2013 #44
OK, then we differ LittleBlue Apr 2013 #62
What do you mean by "deny?" geek tragedy Apr 2013 #64
A close friend of mine is happily married to a man who is unable to have sex... LanternWaste Apr 2013 #106
Why do you assume they are unable to have sex? MattBaggins Apr 2013 #116
Why do you assume she's assuming anything? opiate69 Apr 2013 #125
Still not an excuse for cheating. If you can't tolerate your partner not able or MillennialDem Apr 2013 #130
Good god. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #49
I guess I'm just what you needed Zorra Apr 2013 #55
Mormon get the red out Apr 2013 #57
Well that explains his diaper fetish Blue Owl Apr 2013 #61
Congratulations Ms. Mower Politicalboi Apr 2013 #66
ROFLMAO!!! Zorra Apr 2013 #74
+1!!! Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #77
There is movie about it nolabels Apr 2013 #111
He needs to grow up. His wife just had a miscarriage and all he can think about is he is not appleannie1 Apr 2013 #79
Ugh. Did you read the actual article? geek tragedy Apr 2013 #87
I have had a very healthy marriage of almost 50 years. My husband voluntarily went without sex appleannie1 Apr 2013 #94
But, is it fair to say that the man in the story didn't love his wife geek tragedy Apr 2013 #95
Did you talk about this? MattBaggins Apr 2013 #117
Take a look at the actual WSJ article Matt_in_STL Apr 2013 #90
What a crock... Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #81
1% of the population is asexual and actually doesn't give a shit about it. MadrasT Apr 2013 #120
When you are talking about 99% that is pretty much everybody. Sekhmets Daughter Apr 2013 #121
Checking Etsy... liberalmuse Apr 2013 #84
Gakk. madamesilverspurs Apr 2013 #88
There are many other was of having sex besides intercourse. cbdo2007 Apr 2013 #89
True, but the way this is presented is the problem Taverner Apr 2013 #97
That's what your hand is for. tridim Apr 2013 #98
Sex is more than ejaculation to men, especialy when it comes to sex with geek tragedy Apr 2013 #100
Really?? tridim Apr 2013 #102
I read a post here on DU that claimed women were turned on by their man doing the dishes panader0 Apr 2013 #109
going a year without sex . . .you don't need a study to predict that will have a negative effect bigtree Apr 2013 #112
Per the WSJ, they did (kids, schtupping, happy ending). nt geek tragedy Apr 2013 #115
Wow that's an Tien1985 Apr 2013 #113
This will be as popular as a fart in a spacesuit... n/t backscatter712 Apr 2013 #122
Bullsh*t Rider3 Apr 2013 #128
I agree. MrSlayer Apr 2013 #129
Zing! undeterred Apr 2013 #131
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Report: Denying Men Sex I...»Reply #114