Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

wet.hen88

(64 posts)

5. bla bla

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Wed Apr 24, 2013, 06:00 PM

Apr 2013

He always "talks" to those who are either too dumb or too "Foxed" to know the facts. If he is so concerned about national security, why doesn't he try to improve it? lord knows he's got enough seniority...

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

12 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

lindsey graham: 'Between Benghazi and Boston, We’re Going Backward in Nat'l Security' [View all] spanone Apr 2013 OP

I sure wish that twerp would STFU. The Velveteen Ocelot Apr 2013 #1

not a chance in hell... spanone Apr 2013 #2

Let's see- 8 people died in those incidents...how many thousands have died in the same time period Beaverhausen Apr 2013 #3

Hmmm, we implemented everything the RW said they wanted The Straight Story Apr 2013 #4

bla bla wet.hen88 Apr 2013 #5

lindsey graham, perfect example of going backwards in evolution, so it evens out. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2013 #6

Please list the number of embassies attacked during Bush's tenure malaise Apr 2013 #7

Total douchebag. nt City Lights Apr 2013 #8

Is he so stupid that he cannot tell the difference between foreign policy Rex Apr 2013 #9

When can we finally tell that horrid gas bag to just shut the fuck up. MattBaggins Apr 2013 #10

Darn shame. There's nothing left of that poor Benghazi horse. lpbk2713 Apr 2013 #11

3,000 dead on 9/11, thousands more in Iraq davekriss Apr 2013 #12