Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was unarmed in the boat! So why in the hell did they say..... [View all]randome
(34,845 posts)36. You're still ignoring the evidence that DUers listening to scanners heard 'No live ammo'.
Instead, you insist on your own 'evidence', which is...non-existent.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was unarmed in the boat! So why in the hell did they say..... [View all]
Logical
Apr 2013
OP
LOL, yes, because their plan to take him alive included shooting the boat full of holes....
Logical
Apr 2013
#3
Look at this post...I was also listening to the police scanner and heard them call for rubber bullet
HipChick
Apr 2013
#43
But why shoot up the boat? If you are going to kill him because of explosives then just.....
Logical
Apr 2013
#7
You're still ignoring the evidence that DUers listening to scanners heard 'No live ammo'.
randome
Apr 2013
#36
OK, that makes sense. But that whole everyone emptying guns deal happens a lot. n-t
Logical
Apr 2013
#18
Actually the SWAT team that took him into custody said it *looked* like a knife wound
magellan
Apr 2013
#47
Another question - did they KNOW it was him and not a homeless guy needing a refuge?
elfin
Apr 2013
#29