Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 08:39 AM Apr 2013

Big brands rejected Bangladesh factory safety plan [View all]

As Bangladesh reels from the deaths of hundreds of garment workers in a building collapse, the refusal of global retailers to pay for strict nationwide factory inspections is bringing renewed scrutiny to an industry that has profited from a country notorious for its hazardous workplaces and subsistence level wages.

After a factory fire killed 112 garment workers in November, clothing brands and retailers continued to reject a union-sponsored proposal to improve safety throughout Bangladesh's $20 billion garment industry. Instead, companies expanded a patchwork system of private audits and training that labor groups say improves very little in a country where official inspections are lax and factory owners have close relations with the government.

In the meantime, the number of deaths and injuries has mounted. In the five months since last year's deadly blaze at Tazreen Fashions Ltd., there were 40 other fires in Bangladeshi factories, killing nine workers and injuring more than 660, according to a labor organization tied to the AFL-CIO umbrella group of American unions.

Wednesday's collapse of the Rana Plaza building that killed more than 300 people is the worst disaster to hit Bangladesh's fast-growing and politically powerful garment industry. For those working to overhaul conditions for workers who are paid as little as $38 a month, it is a grim reminder that corporate social responsibility programs are failing to deliver on lofty promises.

<snip>

http://news.yahoo.com/big-brands-rejected-bangladesh-factory-safety-plan-122206229.html

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why should corporations care about dispensable brown people malaise Apr 2013 #1
yes, it's fuck poor people cali Apr 2013 #2
Yep but they're the elites and they grease the palms of their cronies - the political malaise Apr 2013 #3
yes it is an international racket. thanks for responding to the op cali Apr 2013 #4
Not really - there hae been a few threads and some folks have responded malaise Apr 2013 #5
I am definitely interested and want this put in front of as many eyes as possible Cirque du So-What Apr 2013 #10
People are rarely interested in these kinds of tragedies, because it raises uncomfortable Brickbat Apr 2013 #15
I don't think people are uninterested. redqueen Apr 2013 #20
"Corporate social responsibility" is an oxymoron n/t Fumesucker Apr 2013 #6
no, it's not. it's tiny and it needs to grow, but it exists cali Apr 2013 #8
The very purpose of a corporation is to avoid personal responsibility Fumesucker Apr 2013 #12
there are socially responsible and sustainable corporations cali Apr 2013 #13
I have a picture of an actual Wolf licking my face Fumesucker Apr 2013 #14
This. redqueen Apr 2013 #21
How about some congressional hearings leftynyc Apr 2013 #7
I was thinking the same thing cali Apr 2013 #9
Yes, excellent leftynyc Apr 2013 #11
The numbers are damning. LiberalAndProud Apr 2013 #16
He's saying they won't do anything until they're forced to. redqueen Apr 2013 #18
Who said I was surprised? LiberalAndProud Apr 2013 #19
Corporations and owners are never held accountable. redqueen Apr 2013 #17
Is there any way to find out exactly which brands they were making? cbdo2007 Apr 2013 #22
One brand is for sure a Canadian brand laundry_queen Apr 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Big brands rejected Bangl...