Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

AnotherMcIntosh

(11,064 posts)
22. This is doable.
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 03:09 PM
Apr 2013

Taxing all transfers of funds to outside of the USA at 100% could do exactly what you want. If a corporation wants to transfer $1 million outside of the country, let them come up with $2 million dollars. One million for the tax liability and one million for the recipient of the funds. If anyone thinks that this is unfair, they can look at IRC 6672 which makes certain amounts (in a different context) subject to a 100% tax.

Without imposing any tarrifs on goods imported into this country, tax the transfer of money going out of the country so that profiting from foreign manufacturing jobs becomes unprofitable. If a 100% tax is insufficient, make it 200%, then 300% until someone gets the message.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

There is only one way to fix it BethanyQuartz Apr 2013 #1
Tax all of their income, eliminate deductions. Egalitarian Thug Apr 2013 #4
As they should! BethanyQuartz Apr 2013 #10
This is doable. AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #22
I want high tariffs too BethanyQuartz Apr 2013 #44
Thanks. I'm reminded of a physician SheilaT Apr 2013 #2
Just ask Tommy Friedman . . . he gleefully muses about the Death of the Server: HughBeaumont Apr 2013 #3
The advance of technology will inevitably force us to redefine work and full time. Egalitarian Thug Apr 2013 #6
That jerk was on NPR the other day. GoCubsGo Apr 2013 #7
He's the "go-to" because he pushes the narrative they want to hear. HughBeaumont Apr 2013 #13
There's not a finite amount of work to be done. Recursion Apr 2013 #26
Is anyone saying there's a finite amount of work to be done? I'm certainly not. HughBeaumont Apr 2013 #31
There is an increasingly small amount of necessary work that needs to be done wickerwoman Apr 2013 #34
I agree the economics of plenty will take some adjustment Recursion Apr 2013 #40
I agree, wickerwoman Apr 2013 #47
The problem is one is assuming the people doing the ordering have jobs and money to spend lunatica Apr 2013 #49
Well, that's the thing. Tommy doesn't know and worse yet, he doesn't CARE. HughBeaumont Apr 2013 #54
Outsourcing medical recordkeeping BethanyQuartz Apr 2013 #12
I know. I actually work in a hospital, SheilaT Apr 2013 #19
Errors in medical transcription now that's a scary thought BethanyQuartz Apr 2013 #45
Don't bother (with medical records jobs) Autumn Colors Apr 2013 #20
I'm 64. I plan to keep my current job SheilaT Apr 2013 #46
Train to work tax season with H&R Block Autumn Colors Apr 2013 #48
As someone who is not crazy about numbers SheilaT Apr 2013 #51
If you're able to afford it Autumn Colors Apr 2013 #56
I have complicated taxes, with all sorts SheilaT Apr 2013 #57
She has very little in the way of expenses Autumn Colors Apr 2013 #58
Rec'd, and thanks for posting this. nt raccoon Apr 2013 #5
Du rec. Nt xchrom Apr 2013 #8
The simplistic scum bag computer religious are going to be the first to starve . olddots Apr 2013 #9
exactly WHAT are laid off IT workers and engineers supposed to train for? nt antigop Apr 2013 #11
It's really the most galling of all wealth/corporate axioms . . . HughBeaumont Apr 2013 #14
Free trade agreements are not the answer, that is for sure. Dragonfli Apr 2013 #15
what can we do to change it? UNIONS. Put it in the contract --- NO OUTSOURCING. nt antigop Apr 2013 #16
I agree that unions are what is needed to give workers collective power Dragonfli Apr 2013 #18
the ones who are still in the US get it in their contract -- NO OUTSOURCING, medical care, antigop Apr 2013 #25
I hope they can and do! Dragonfli Apr 2013 #29
right now, it's the only real leverage they have. nt antigop Apr 2013 #35
"Bill Clinton mistakenly took up Reagan's cause" If Clinton didn't benefit from this, I would agree AnotherMcIntosh Apr 2013 #23
LOL, I was only being polite, even then only as a reflection of my weird sense of humor Dragonfli Apr 2013 #24
Noam Chomsky - Clinton's Vision - December 1, 1993 (free trade, NAFTA) antigop Apr 2013 #27
Noam Chomsky was right, that was a good OP thanks for linking me to it Dragonfli Apr 2013 #30
Here's a fix. Cleita Apr 2013 #17
there's only ONE way to fix everything WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2013 #21
but not a damn thing is going to change until Democrats figure out that THEIR PARTY is part of the antigop Apr 2013 #36
Absolutely spot on. Just enough are beholden to big money interests... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Apr 2013 #42
At bottom, the problem is with Washington polices duffyduff Apr 2013 #50
There aren't enough jobs to go around. The solution is to permanently send money to the unemployed. reformist2 Apr 2013 #28
not a solution. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #33
Nobody has proposed any way to employ everyone. And I understand why. reformist2 Apr 2013 #39
it's called ghettoization. HiPointDem Apr 2013 #32
What's shocking is the number of comments in the original article that are defending Walker kimbutgar Apr 2013 #37
Comments sections to nearly EVERY website other than here make me weep with agony. HughBeaumont Apr 2013 #38
Preach it, Hugh! nt antigop Apr 2013 #43
K&R woo me with science Apr 2013 #41
This is also a concentration of wealth issue CincyDem Apr 2013 #52
Reaganomics is officially the biggest scam in U.S. History. Jamaal510 Apr 2013 #53
And America is still in LOVE with this scam!! HughBeaumont Apr 2013 #55
kick Liberal_in_LA Apr 2013 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here's What Happens When ...»Reply #22