Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Here's What Happens When Good Jobs Go Away and Don't Come Back [View all]AnotherMcIntosh
(11,064 posts)22. This is doable.
Taxing all transfers of funds to outside of the USA at 100% could do exactly what you want. If a corporation wants to transfer $1 million outside of the country, let them come up with $2 million dollars. One million for the tax liability and one million for the recipient of the funds. If anyone thinks that this is unfair, they can look at IRC 6672 which makes certain amounts (in a different context) subject to a 100% tax.
Without imposing any tarrifs on goods imported into this country, tax the transfer of money going out of the country so that profiting from foreign manufacturing jobs becomes unprofitable. If a 100% tax is insufficient, make it 200%, then 300% until someone gets the message.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Just ask Tommy Friedman . . . he gleefully muses about the Death of the Server:
HughBeaumont
Apr 2013
#3
The advance of technology will inevitably force us to redefine work and full time.
Egalitarian Thug
Apr 2013
#6
Is anyone saying there's a finite amount of work to be done? I'm certainly not.
HughBeaumont
Apr 2013
#31
There is an increasingly small amount of necessary work that needs to be done
wickerwoman
Apr 2013
#34
The problem is one is assuming the people doing the ordering have jobs and money to spend
lunatica
Apr 2013
#49
Well, that's the thing. Tommy doesn't know and worse yet, he doesn't CARE.
HughBeaumont
Apr 2013
#54
The simplistic scum bag computer religious are going to be the first to starve .
olddots
Apr 2013
#9
what can we do to change it? UNIONS. Put it in the contract --- NO OUTSOURCING. nt
antigop
Apr 2013
#16
the ones who are still in the US get it in their contract -- NO OUTSOURCING, medical care,
antigop
Apr 2013
#25
"Bill Clinton mistakenly took up Reagan's cause" If Clinton didn't benefit from this, I would agree
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#23
LOL, I was only being polite, even then only as a reflection of my weird sense of humor
Dragonfli
Apr 2013
#24
but not a damn thing is going to change until Democrats figure out that THEIR PARTY is part of the
antigop
Apr 2013
#36
Absolutely spot on. Just enough are beholden to big money interests...
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
Apr 2013
#42
There aren't enough jobs to go around. The solution is to permanently send money to the unemployed.
reformist2
Apr 2013
#28
What's shocking is the number of comments in the original article that are defending Walker
kimbutgar
Apr 2013
#37
Comments sections to nearly EVERY website other than here make me weep with agony.
HughBeaumont
Apr 2013
#38