Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
1. Help? Will it totally screw anyone injured, or any business damaged, by the explosions?
Fri Apr 26, 2013, 06:28 PM
Apr 2013

Does ruling it as terrorism mean insurance will not have to pay?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Boston was not terrorism [View all] hootinholler Apr 2013 OP
Help? Will it totally screw anyone injured, or any business damaged, by the explosions? peacebird Apr 2013 #1
Depends on the policy. hootinholler Apr 2013 #7
Sheesh, another way for insurance to take our money and provide no coverage. Sweet. peacebird Apr 2013 #9
Terrorism is considered an act of war nadinbrzezinski Apr 2013 #12
As President Obama said it was an act of terrorism. former9thward Apr 2013 #2
No way the insurance companies would even try that. elehhhhna Apr 2013 #3
They will. hootinholler Apr 2013 #6
Oh Yes They Will dballance Apr 2013 #20
L&T will go to court and since this isn't state-sponsored terrorism elehhhhna Apr 2013 #29
When someone uses violence, or the threat of violence, to achieve a political goal... Major Nikon Apr 2013 #4
But as long as it is not classed as such... Lady Freedom Returns Apr 2013 #8
You're assuming the BAA has no such coverage Major Nikon Apr 2013 #13
Assuming that they do is not a good one either. n/t Lady Freedom Returns Apr 2013 #21
Organizing a large public event without it would be monumentally stupid Major Nikon Apr 2013 #23
Yes. Terrorism has more than just revenge behind it. PDJane Apr 2013 #5
Just a friendly little bombing? is that it? geckosfeet Apr 2013 #10
I don't see why Major Nikon Apr 2013 #11
There was an article on DU just a few days ago justiceischeap Apr 2013 #14
I don't know why your OP isn't getting more recs. Now, I'm not sayin your... Poll_Blind Apr 2013 #15
I'm just trying to raise awareness on this. hootinholler Apr 2013 #24
You are one of my favorite DUers, Hoot.. Fumesucker Apr 2013 #33
Right, and Nidal Hasan shooting up Ft Hood was just "work place violence" Leslie Valley Apr 2013 #16
And Klebold and Harris shooting up Columbine? Do you think that's the same thing as well? Poll_Blind Apr 2013 #18
I honestly have never heard that Klebold and Harris had been converted Leslie Valley Apr 2013 #26
Are you saying that perpetrators of terrorist acts must be Muslim? cyberswede Apr 2013 #34
If an insurance company has a terrorism exclusion, then jazzimov Apr 2013 #17
Does this clause apply to health insurance? customerserviceguy Apr 2013 #19
A week plus of loss of business for every business in the exclusion zone. hootinholler Apr 2013 #22
A week? customerserviceguy Apr 2013 #37
Maybe you have not been listening to the news. THis has been label terrorism now, by all. Do you FailureToCommunicate Apr 2013 #25
Apparently what you think I think isn't what I actually think hootinholler Apr 2013 #27
The relief funds are for the victims, who's lived have forever changed from this. FailureToCommunicate Apr 2013 #31
also,iirc health ins. doesn't have a terror exclusion -- elehhhhna Apr 2013 #28
It's an interesting take. Savannahmann Apr 2013 #30
I believe my business insurance policy allows you to pay more... Bonhomme Richard Apr 2013 #32
It's arguably not terrorism under 18 USC § 2332b (the federal terrorism law) El Fuego Apr 2013 #35
The definition of a word depends on who is using it how. Hence this could be, and could not be, at uppityperson Apr 2013 #36
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Boston was not terrorism»Reply #1