Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "If You Don't Want to be Reminded of an Unpleasant Reality, Don't Ask to be Reminded" [View all]The Doctor.
(17,266 posts)192. Again, notsomuch.
Lecture:
1. An exposition of a given subject delivered before an audience or a class, as for the purpose of instruction.
2. An earnest admonition or reproof; a reprimand.
Tantrum:
A fit of bad temper. Also called regionally hissy2, hissy fit.
The OP is a reasoned explanation of why and under what circumstances one can expect to be notified of an otherwise unpleasant reality. You can delude yourself to any degree you feel necessary to think it is anything but an earnest admonition against people who voice refusal to vote for a Democrat for President and then complain when they are told, on a Democratic message board that their attitude is inappropriate. It wasn't 'angry' or 'upset', it was straightforward, earnest, and reasonable.
When someone complains about being reminded, on a Democratic message board, of the fact that a Republican could win the White House if Obama does not receive enough support after stating that they refuse to support him, that is much more like a 'tantrum'.
A 'tantrum' happens when someone is faced with something they don't want to hear and, instead of acknowledging the reality, they have to turn around and attack the messenger with accusations of 'extortion' or 'authoritarianism', or 'censorship'.
You can pretend all you want that the definitions and applications are reversible, but the only people that will agree will be the other tantrum-throwers that hate hearing the cold, hard truth.
As I said in the OP:
"I can always tell I'm standing on the correct side of an issue by how much the other side has to go out of their way to mischaracterize, conflate, and create strawmen."
After seeing how many of 'you' had to make shit up out of thin air, create strawmen, and make this about ME instead of the substance of the OP (like you just did!), the more solid the ground I stand on becomes.
Now, would you like to make this about the substance of the OP, or continue to talk about me?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
215 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"If You Don't Want to be Reminded of an Unpleasant Reality, Don't Ask to be Reminded" [View all]
The Doctor.
Dec 2011
OP
To block Bush legislation is not 'sinking to Republican levels' it is standing up against
sabrina 1
Dec 2011
#194
The 'fact' is after Obama took office dems had a filibuster-proof majority in Senate only SHORT time
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#149
Wrong - much major legislation in the last several decades sidestepped the filibuster
eomer
Dec 2011
#172
Tax the wealthy, make the tax cut on the middle class permanent, and create a public option.
eomer
Dec 2011
#197
But a bill can only get into 'reconciliation' after the bill's been on the senate floor
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#200
Here's a link to the new list of the emoticons, in case you don't have it already
Tx4obama
Dec 2011
#211
Or we can have both, where we have the PATRIOT Act and nuts are free to own guns
Doctor_J
Dec 2011
#133
Maybe there is a reason that so many Democratic websites are critical of Obama.
JDPriestly
Dec 2011
#99
Well, this is pretty much the most vicious "Democratic" website I've seen when it comes to BHO.
MADem
Dec 2011
#138
I was trying to find it via Google, but no official reports, so I thought maybe you might know.
gateley
Dec 2011
#37
And yet another person can't be bothered to READ the post they're responding to.
The Doctor.
Dec 2011
#64
So if you were faced with the choice of voting for one of two Fascists, which would you
JDPriestly
Dec 2011
#102
For the record, I won't be voting 'for' Obama, I'll be voting 'against' that evil
coalition_unwilling
Dec 2011
#10
Yet you have no real proof of that beyond the fact that he had to get past Republican obstruction.
The Doctor.
Dec 2011
#58
Yep, he preemptively caved his way right on by that Republican "obstruction."
a simple pattern
Dec 2011
#62
A quick glance turned up the usual "whine", "outrage" and "righteous indignation" talking points.
Bonobo
Dec 2011
#32
Well, I'm fairly confident that most Either/Or scenarios we're presented with...
LanternWaste
Dec 2011
#50
I don't think it's my confidence that's misplaced-- merely the prognostications of the few.
LanternWaste
Dec 2011
#74
Did a search - couldn't find anyone asking you to tell them how to vote.
kenny blankenship
Dec 2011
#54
K&R. It's entertaining to watch The Doctor. surgically dismiss non sequiturs.
great white snark
Dec 2011
#71
Unfair! Unfair!! Yer being logical! That's oppressive to non-logic. Isn't that a TOS violation?
TygrBright
Dec 2011
#73
I still have the quaint notion that my vote belongs to me. Not the party or any politician.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2011
#75
You have chosen to ignore that some of the most ardent bashing of Dems has come from
Doctor_J
Dec 2011
#120
if a Republican becomes president THEN people will regain perspective!!
StarsInHerHair
Dec 2011
#145
It is not authoritarian to tell people what your own choices are and expect them to
patrice
Dec 2011
#139
Especially when they don't know the diiference between "ambivalent" and "ambiguous"!
Zhade
Dec 2011
#210
I am a Democrat who believes we can wear our big boy pants and handle a little criticism.
Dustlawyer
Dec 2011
#179