Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Don't let the gun nuts frame the debate [View all]Captain Stern
(2,255 posts)168. I think you're wrong (at least in part)
Perhaps money did change hands. It wouldn't surprise me at all.
But I think ultimately the lawmakers that voted against this bill wouldn't have done so if they thought it would cost them come election time. And I don't think their 'no' vote is going to cost most of them at all. A lot of people see their 'no' vote as sticking up for freedom and rights and such. A lot of the lawmakers that voted against the bill aren't going to hide from their vote...they're going to celebrate it. They are going to say they were protecting the Constitution and that they stopped the 'gun grabbers'......and they're going to get a lot of votes for saying that, even though it's bullshit.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
196 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Great advice. The pro-gun types have controlled the argument for way too long. (nt)
Paladin
Apr 2013
#10
GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ
DainBramaged
Apr 2013
#36
GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ
DainBramaged
Apr 2013
#81
Stop with the win/lose shit America loses because of your idiotic clinging to an outdated Amendment
DainBramaged
Apr 2013
#86
The OP specifically invoked Japan in the context of the gun debate. Why is it not relevant
geckosfeet
Apr 2013
#80
This is the sort of inane blithering that stops all meaningful discussion.
Union Scribe
Apr 2013
#126
What a load of BS -- "Guns are part of who we are as a nation." Maybe that needs to change.
Hoyt
Apr 2013
#54
Women carrying don't bother me much, because they usually aren't into the killing aspect of guns.
Hoyt
Apr 2013
#89
Easy...do like Australia did and have a buyback then make it a felony to own a gun
sandy78
Apr 2013
#30
GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ
DainBramaged
Apr 2013
#37
GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ GUNZ
DainBramaged
Apr 2013
#53
Apparently, the first step is for about 100 or so on this board to incessantly insult Democrats and
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#56
Why on earth would "armed confiscation" take place if these guns were made illegal?
Robb
Apr 2013
#45
As a Congressman, Lincoln was voted out of office for his criticism of the Mexican War. nt
Robb
Apr 2013
#50
Here, enjoy a dog jogging, we don't have to persuade anybody that's where you're all wrong
DainBramaged
Apr 2013
#72
No - nothing happened because to enable national bg checks would cost money.
geckosfeet
Apr 2013
#85
oh yes. i have had similar experiences with some folks. But in any case, the systems must be built.
geckosfeet
Apr 2013
#179
I don't think Japan is a good example, unless your secretly advocating a racist agenda
pediatricmedic
Apr 2013
#138
All the more reason to be wary of right-wing bloggers and junk science with false data.
DanTex
Apr 2013
#188
LOL, you might find the relevance of finding 2/3 of Congress and 38 states to do as you please
tritsofme
Apr 2013
#144
They are trying harder than ever to dilute the message and lock down this thread
DainBramaged
Apr 2013
#163