Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Are we a police state yet? [View all]Doremus
(7,273 posts)65. Our local police force, which was narrowly saved from draconian personnel cuts by a tax levy,
apparently has all necessary resources to answer upward of a dozen calls a day from the local WalMart to arrest their shoplifters.
I asked a councilman whether the city is billing them for their disproportionately large use of dept. resources and his response was that that's what the PD is for.
Yet when a taxpayer in the city falls ill and the rescue squad takes them to the hospital, the city wastes no time in sending the patient their $200 invoice.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
68 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
No, we are not. This is just a story about a poorly managed police force in CO.
Gravitycollapse
Apr 2013
#2
Wal-Mart is pretty powerful if alleged stolen merchandise can command the tax payers to foot the
midnight
Apr 2013
#3
" Police say the suspect has a criminal history, including use of a weapon."
uppityperson
Apr 2013
#46
I just find that this amount of police presence pricey... Especially when we can't feed
midnight
Apr 2013
#61
Honeycombe8's response #17 sheds much light on this. Might reduce the outrage level a bit.
bike man
Apr 2013
#58
Our local police force, which was narrowly saved from draconian personnel cuts by a tax levy,
Doremus
Apr 2013
#65
It was clear to many of us that what happened in Boston was setting a dangerous precidence.
MellowYellow
Apr 2013
#4
The events in the OP occured prior to Boston, thus Boston was not a precedent to CO
Bluenorthwest
Apr 2013
#12
If one is dead, they lose their 1st amendment right.Anarchy is never the answer.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#9
I hope you've built yourself a survival shelter and have it well stocked with weapons
lunatica
Apr 2013
#30
NO. We need MORE security & less anarchy.Remember the hoard shoppers crushing a securityman
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#8
You are comparing holiday retail mall security with the militarization of local law enforcement?
Earth_First
Apr 2013
#11
I would rather have Control than Kaos. Mel Brooks got it right back then.
graham4anything
Apr 2013
#39
He wasn't hunted that intensely for stealing a bike. Here's what it was about:
Honeycombe8
Apr 2013
#17
Still, it seems that neighborhood "lockdowns" are being used for more minor crimes.
Junkdrawer
Apr 2013
#23
Minor crimes? The next lockdown was for bombing the Boston marathon. Minor crime? Huh.
uppityperson
Apr 2013
#48
Like where? This is not an example of that (kidnapping is a federal crime)....
Honeycombe8
Apr 2013
#56
Thank you, I read the article, followed links and found that information also. Missed that in the OP
uppityperson
Apr 2013
#47
Here, for three bucks you can see what a police state looks and feels like
BeyondGeography
Apr 2013
#28
No. We are already a FASCIST state. Your story clearly illustrates that when the SWAT team
BlueCaliDem
Apr 2013
#43