Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

hollysmom

(5,946 posts)

3. this is not sharing the risk, this is putting the risk onthe employee -

Reply to Omaha Steve (Original post)

Mon Apr 29, 2013, 01:55 PM

Apr 2013

hencethe company has no vested interest in the stockp performance and they can find a job for their idiot nephew.

In one company - our 401k was invested with a mutual fund company that was one of our clients - I always felt the company agreed for them to put us in the worst performing mutual funds in exchange for continuing to do business with us.
Let companies invest in Social security plus. we would get more. I am done with the market.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Adjustable pension plan design begins to gain converts (this plan screwed my mom) [View all] Omaha Steve Apr 2013 OP

I'm slightly confused. SheilaT Apr 2013 #1

Mom's pension averaged $150 a month Omaha Steve Apr 2013 #2

Thank you for the clarification. SheilaT Apr 2013 #4

this is not sharing the risk, this is putting the risk onthe employee - hollysmom Apr 2013 #3