Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

flyingfysh

(1,990 posts)

3. Looks like that employer was trying to avoid paying unemployment compensation

Reply to kentuck (Original post)

Mon Apr 29, 2013, 04:03 PM

Apr 2013

Doing things that way allows him to avoid paying unemployment. If someone resigns voluntarily, he is not entitled to anything if he does not get rehired.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I once worked for an employer that asked for the resignation of every employee... [View all] kentuck Apr 2013 OP

Umm, wouldn't that be what elections are? TDale313 Apr 2013 #1

But the people should be motivated to get rid of every incumbent. kentuck Apr 2013 #4

For House members, that happens every two years. MineralMan Apr 2013 #2

Looks like that employer was trying to avoid paying unemployment compensation flyingfysh Apr 2013 #3

A company I used to work for leftynyc Apr 2013 #7

Just curious... KansDem Apr 2013 #5

Many were at lower salaries ... kentuck Apr 2013 #6

This happening in some placed with teachers newfie11 Apr 2013 #8

Wouldn't make a significant difference Fumesucker Apr 2013 #9

if you resign you don't get unemployment. RILib Apr 2013 #10