General Discussion

DevonRex

(22,541 posts)

23. That IS weird since these guys are IN the govt and ARE accountable.

Reply to Myrina (Reply #20)

Tue Apr 30, 2013, 12:53 PM

Apr 2013

Maybe have your eyes checked? Or something? Just saying...

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

58 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Report: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's repeated requests for a lawyer were ignored [View all] TalkingDog Apr 2013 OP

Contrary to popular belief, this is nothing new. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #1

Then what exactly does due process of law mean? n/t malaise Apr 2013 #2

Even after they Mirandize you, they will still try to get you to talk. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #3

No. Not really. Ms. Toad Apr 2013 #4

Didn't say it would be admissable, or even legal. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #5

Have fun playing word games. n/t Ms. Toad Apr 2013 #7

Doesn't matter what the police do, once someone asks for a lawyer, nothing the police do after sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #11

Read Post #3. I meant exactly what I said. Ikonoklast Apr 2013 #16

No I have not. And I am not doubting you that the police do not respect the law. sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #19

Not really Vinnie From Indy Apr 2013 #32

I agree with you. Technically. gvstn Apr 2013 #9

An alternative to waterboarding ... ? Myrina Apr 2013 #22

I found the term gvstn Apr 2013 #33

Now you dreamed up torture in the Boston hospital. DevonRex Apr 2013 #34

And a little more of our Civil Rights go down the drain Savannahmann Apr 2013 #6

This message was self-deleted by its author DevonRex Apr 2013 #8

"but that request was ignored since he was being questioned under the public safety exemption". DevonRex Apr 2013 #10

What did he 'get wrong'? Did you even read the article? Greenwald is referencing the LA Times sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #12

Greenwald is incorrect in describing the denial of counsel as substantially different than geek tragedy Apr 2013 #14

Greenwald is correct to point out that once a suspect asks for an attorney, the questioning sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #36

NO NO NO. PUBLIC SAFETY EXCEPTION WAS IN EFFECT. nt DevonRex Apr 2013 #44

I see. Got it. nt Honeycombe8 May 2013 #58

IMO, this breach of protocol only relates to admissibility of evidence Zorra May 2013 #50

Yes, I think this is Greenwald's point. Not so much about this case, but the general abuse of sabrina 1 May 2013 #57

Any prejudice he suffers from being questioned after geek tragedy May 2013 #56

The justice department already said that they would not use any of the statements so gained Yo_Mama May 2013 #51

LOL. Only everything. The whole purpose of the exception is to question the suspect. DevonRex Apr 2013 #21

The exception was only for 48 hours. Greenwald was referring to the LA Times claim that sabrina 1 Apr 2013 #38

LOL. NO. IT IS DURING THE EXCEPTION PERIOD. Read the LA Times story. DevonRex Apr 2013 #39

That is a QUOTE from the FUCKING LA TIMES ARTICLE. Quote Marks. Notice them. DevonRex Apr 2013 #46

Same difference as not Mirandizing--they get to move to exclude the statements given geek tragedy Apr 2013 #13

Where are all the assholes who argued about miranda exceptions? Gravitycollapse Apr 2013 #15

"...virtually unheard of..." Implies there is case law that addresses this. randome Apr 2013 #17

Wait, ProSense Apr 2013 #18

"interagency High Value Detainee Interrogation Group " Myrina Apr 2013 #20

That IS weird since these guys are IN the govt and ARE accountable. DevonRex Apr 2013 #23

oh Jesus already, just look at the damn title Myrina Apr 2013 #24

The LA Times article is good. This one is trash. DevonRex Apr 2013 #26

Accountable, to whom? Savannahmann Apr 2013 #42

Fast and Furious, really?? OMFG. I see now. DevonRex Apr 2013 #43

Fast and Furious is not a RW Meme Savannahmann Apr 2013 #45

LOL! DevonRex Apr 2013 #47

It's a shame you're so ill informed Savannahmann Apr 2013 #48

Greenwald. LOL...nt SidDithers Apr 2013 #25

He seems to be getting desperate. That's DevonRex Apr 2013 #27

I'm waiting for the inevitable 2 or 3 updates... SidDithers Apr 2013 #30

Once a suspect demands an attorney, police and FBI are obligated to kestrel91316 Apr 2013 #28

Not with the public exception. But you have to understand what miranda is about and what all of due stevenleser Apr 2013 #29

Miranda Rights? All I can think about is those 3 dead (1 child) and the hundreds injured and maimed demosincebirth Apr 2013 #31

Funny, where is our local law experts? Rex Apr 2013 #35

Read the LA Times story. I linked to it above somewhere. DevonRex Apr 2013 #40

We'll have to see if this is true. First, he could barely talk. Honeycombe8 Apr 2013 #37

This is NOT TRUE. The LA Times article he refers to says it was during the exception DevonRex Apr 2013 #41

It will not matter KinMd Apr 2013 #49

I agree, but think publicizing what he said makes it impossible to get an impartial jury Justice May 2013 #52

Somebody here seems to have decided to pound the table. Demit May 2013 #53

It's not like he's an American citizen or anything burnodo May 2013 #54

The boy should have just told them "fairy tale stories" to make them avebury May 2013 #55