Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Krugman: "But that says more about the complainers than it does about Obama himself." [View all]
The WYSIWYG president
Theres a lot of dismay/rage on the left over Obama, a number of cries that he isnt the man progressives thought they were voting for.
But that says more about the complainers than it does about Obama himself. If you actually paid attention to the substance of what he was saying during the primary, you realized that
<...>
But on health care, I dont see how he could have gotten much more. How could he have made Joe Lieberman less, um, Liebermanish? And I have to say that much as I disagree with Ben Nelson about many things, he has seemed refreshingly honest, at least in the final stages, about what he will and wont accept. Meanwhile the fact is that Republicans have formed a solid bloc of opposition to Obamas ability to do, well, anything.
But back to Obama: the important thing to bear in mind is that this isnt about him; and, equally important, it isnt about you. If youve fallen out of love with a politician, well, so what? You should just keep working for the things you believe in.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/the-wysiwyg-president/
Theres a lot of dismay/rage on the left over Obama, a number of cries that he isnt the man progressives thought they were voting for.
But that says more about the complainers than it does about Obama himself. If you actually paid attention to the substance of what he was saying during the primary, you realized that
<...>
But on health care, I dont see how he could have gotten much more. How could he have made Joe Lieberman less, um, Liebermanish? And I have to say that much as I disagree with Ben Nelson about many things, he has seemed refreshingly honest, at least in the final stages, about what he will and wont accept. Meanwhile the fact is that Republicans have formed a solid bloc of opposition to Obamas ability to do, well, anything.
But back to Obama: the important thing to bear in mind is that this isnt about him; and, equally important, it isnt about you. If youve fallen out of love with a politician, well, so what? You should just keep working for the things you believe in.
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/the-wysiwyg-president/
Good question.
Obama To Press Corps: I Cant Make GOP Cooperate On Budget
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022776876
33 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: "But that says more about the complainers than it does about Obama himself." [View all]
ProSense
Apr 2013
OP
It's inevitable there will be complaints. But it's not like this is LBN, you know.
freshwest
Apr 2013
#7
In point of fact for many single poor people it is exactly garnishing their paychecks
dsc
May 2013
#25
Krugman wanted to say: "If you fall out of love with a president, so F*CKING what?"
Number23
May 2013
#14