Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)"London kept the dance halls open during the Blitz, but Boston shut Fenway because of a pipe bomb." [View all]
Last edited Wed May 1, 2013, 06:34 AM - Edit history (1)
By the end of the week, I found myself wondering if a better society wouldnt have kept Boston open and shuttered CNN. Did we really shut down an entire city to catch one wounded boy? Have we overextended the First Amendment in granting the press effective immunity from responsibility even as we become a nation intent on revoking the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth? Theres a temptation to read the scenes of deserted streets and paramilitary police as teasers for the sort of incipient totalitarianism, and maybe it is, but as an aficionado of conspiracy literature, I find that this analysis tends inevitably toward the conspiracists biggest flaw, which is to over-read intention and to presume that history has a narrative.If you asked me to describe in one word a culture that dispatches the black helicopters and assault vehicles in response to a dyadic pair of wayward, violent youth, Id say, decadent. London kept the dance halls open during the Blitz, but Boston shut Fenway because of a pipe bomb. Theres some truth to the claim that Americans are uniquely deferential to authority and prone to authoritarian solutions, but weve also become a culture thats largely adopted the values of an aristocracy: we want perfect safety and perfect comfort, although well complain mightily about the cost of service these days. For all the John McCains looking up from their thin soup to demand that we Torquemadize the surviving brother in order to discover whether or not this was all part of Cobra Commanders plot, the predominant sentiment behind the desire to prevent the kid from lawyering up and fitting him for concrete boots instead seems to me to be that putting him to trial would just be such a bother, and so expensive.
For all the praetorian hoo-hah on display all day in Boston, the thing that broke the case was some dude going outside to burn a square once the cops gave everyone the all clear. What purpose, then, did the lockdown serve? Well, yinz ever hear of a little thing called The Society of Spectacle? A culture of universal surveillance is a karaoke civilization; the lockdown of Boston was demanded by its own image; CNNs et al.s fake reporting wasnt just the result of an immense, confused official response, but also in a very real sense its cause. Not for nothing does the footage resemble an action flick. The line between reality and fantasy is blurring, yes, but which is really shading into the other?
And this, too, is why the subsequent investigation and trial seem so odd to so many Americans. It reeks of anticlimax. How many more goodbyes do we have to endure before Cate Blanchett and Ian McKellan pack the Bagginses off from Middle Earth? Isnt there something better on? One reason Brave New World holds up better than 1984 is that Huxley had the good humor to pick a winner, not a boot stomping on a human face forever, but orgy-porgy; not violence and death as a threat, but violence and death as entertainment. Hey, do you guys wonder why something as basically dull as The Hunger Games is so extraordinarily popular. Its not because its fantastical. Its because its recognizable.
We can no more tolerate a plodding police investigation and boring trial than we can stand a sensibly edited fight scene in a movie. It isnt by accident that the fools on cable news say that a story is fast moving. Civil libertarians will argue that we turned Boston into a kind of war zone, but no, we turned it into a soundstage, and we turned the population into extras for those emotional establishing shots of regular citizens gazing through plate glass as the Avengers zoom by. So, you know, look: Lindsey Graham isnt the villain, here. Actually, hes the nerd telling everyone to sit down during the credits cause theyre gonna miss the post-credit villain reveal!
http://jacobbacharach.wordpress.com/2013/04/
i posted this partly because i liked the writing and partly to see whether people would actually read it, or just respond to the title....
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"London kept the dance halls open during the Blitz, but Boston shut Fenway because of a pipe bomb." [View all]
HiPointDem
May 2013
OP
But they also had black outs. That is, they took reasonable measures against harm
Bucky
May 2013
#36
so? you prefer we should only hear the blather of professional pundits? i find a lot of bloggers
HiPointDem
May 2013
#7
Closing Boston didn't help catch the bomber...closing Watertown didn't either
HereSince1628
May 2013
#26
Boston sometimes thinks of itself as a small town. That's why the "police state" comparisons fail.
reformist2
May 2013
#5
We have been arguing ourselves blue in the face about how this was not such a
smirkymonkey
May 2013
#68
Yes, but it was important to tell us that it was a dyadic pair, and not a decadent threesome,
winter is coming
May 2013
#27
People killed, limbs blown off, hundreds injured. 'Minor attack'. Another non-Bostonian, I take it?
randome
May 2013
#25
A lot of morons post a lot of dumb stuff on the internet. And we get to read it here.
Buzz Clik
May 2013
#28
England had "Keep Calm and Carry On" - the US has Let the Fear Paralyze You.
liberal N proud
May 2013
#31
Pretty sure that the air raid sirens caused voluntary lockdown all across London.
JoePhilly
May 2013
#55
The terrorists win when the people cringe in fear..that's the point of terrorism.
Tierra_y_Libertad
May 2013
#64