Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
Wed May 1, 2013, 05:56 AM May 2013

"London kept the dance halls open during the Blitz, but Boston shut Fenway because of a pipe bomb." [View all]

Last edited Wed May 1, 2013, 06:34 AM - Edit history (1)

By the end of the week, I found myself wondering if a better society wouldn’t have kept Boston open and shuttered CNN. Did we really shut down an entire city to catch one wounded boy? Have we overextended the First Amendment in granting the press effective immunity from responsibility even as we become a nation intent on revoking the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eighth? There’s a temptation to read the scenes of deserted streets and paramilitary police as teasers for the sort of incipient totalitarianism, and maybe it is, but as an aficionado of conspiracy literature, I find that this analysis tends inevitably toward the conspiracist’s biggest flaw, which is to over-read intention and to presume that history has a narrative.

If you asked me to describe in one word a culture that dispatches the black helicopters and assault vehicles in response to a dyadic pair of wayward, violent youth, I’d say, decadent. London kept the dance halls open during the Blitz, but Boston shut Fenway because of a pipe bomb. There’s some truth to the claim that Americans are uniquely deferential to authority and prone to authoritarian solutions, but we’ve also become a culture that’s largely adopted the values of an aristocracy: we want perfect safety and perfect comfort, although we’ll complain mightily about the cost of service these days. For all the John McCains looking up from their thin soup to demand that we Torquemadize the surviving brother in order to discover whether or not this was all part of Cobra Commander’s plot, the predominant sentiment behind the desire to prevent the kid from “lawyering up” and fitting him for concrete boots instead seems to me to be that putting him to trial would just be such a bother, and so expensive.

For all the praetorian hoo-hah on display all day in Boston, the thing that broke the case was some dude going outside to burn a square once the cops gave everyone the all clear. What purpose, then, did the lockdown serve? Well, yinz ever hear of a little thing called The Society of Spectacle? A culture of universal surveillance is a karaoke civilization; the lockdown of Boston was demanded by its own image; CNN’s et al.’s fake reporting wasn’t just the result of an immense, confused official response, but also in a very real sense its cause. Not for nothing does the footage resemble an action flick. The line between reality and fantasy is blurring, yes, but which is really shading into the other?

And this, too, is why the subsequent investigation and trial seem so odd to so many Americans. It reeks of anticlimax. How many more goodbyes do we have to endure before Cate Blanchett and Ian McKellan pack the Bagginses off from Middle Earth? Isn’t there something better on? One reason Brave New World holds up better than 1984 is that Huxley had the good humor to pick a winner, not a boot stomping on a human face forever, but orgy-porgy; not violence and death as a threat, but violence and death as entertainment. Hey, do you guys wonder why something as basically dull as The Hunger Games is so extraordinarily popular. It’s not because it’s fantastical. It’s because it’s recognizable.

We can no more tolerate a plodding police investigation and boring trial than we can stand a sensibly edited fight scene in a movie. It isn’t by accident that the fools on cable news say that a story is “fast moving.” Civil libertarians will argue that we turned Boston into a kind of war zone, but no, we turned it into a soundstage, and we turned the population into extras for those emotional establishing shots of regular citizens gazing through plate glass as the Avengers zoom by. So, you know, look: Lindsey Graham isn’t the villain, here. Actually, he’s the nerd telling everyone to sit down during the credits ‘cause they’re gonna miss the post-credit villain reveal!

http://jacobbacharach.wordpress.com/2013/04/


i posted this partly because i liked the writing and partly to see whether people would actually read it, or just respond to the title....

71 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I had a relative who lived in London during the Blitz Fumesucker May 2013 #1
My mother was in London for the blitz malaise May 2013 #16
But they also had black outs. That is, they took reasonable measures against harm Bucky May 2013 #36
Cooperation with the authorities is for traitors! randome May 2013 #37
And gas rationing. And food rationing. thucythucy May 2013 #38
England also had one of the.... rppper May 2013 #23
England also had a fantastic intelligence and decoding service. ananda May 2013 #33
The germans did not want us in the war... rppper May 2013 #62
"A screaming comes across the sky..." alcibiades_mystery May 2013 #34
The main "Blitz" was actually concentrated aerial bombing by the Luftwaffe dipsydoodle May 2013 #47
Who are these people? oberliner May 2013 #2
so? you prefer we should only hear the blather of professional pundits? i find a lot of bloggers HiPointDem May 2013 #7
No I loathe them too oberliner May 2013 #8
i don't. do you? this guy is actually a novelist, btw. HiPointDem May 2013 #9
Nope oberliner May 2013 #12
well then maybe you should start a blog! HiPointDem May 2013 #13
London was a forward area, Boston wasn't . n/t orpupilofnature57 May 2013 #3
Everywhere is a forward area in the War On Terra Fumesucker May 2013 #39
But for you, and for me..... orpupilofnature57 May 2013 #70
closing dance halls wouldn't have helped catch Hitler. magical thyme May 2013 #4
Post removed Post removed May 2013 #15
no, spoken like a Bostoner magical thyme May 2013 #17
Closing Boston didn't help catch the bomber...closing Watertown didn't either HereSince1628 May 2013 #26
Boston sometimes thinks of itself as a small town. That's why the "police state" comparisons fail. reformist2 May 2013 #5
Apple, meet orange onenote May 2013 #6
^^^^ This ^^^^ JoePhilly May 2013 #18
Lol jberryhill May 2013 #43
The Germans were certainly deserving of their civil liberties! treestar May 2013 #52
*snort* dixiegrrrrl May 2013 #46
+11111111 treestar May 2013 #51
They were looking for spies though. Arctic Dave May 2013 #57
Are there Bostonians speaking out about this issue? OneGrassRoot May 2013 #10
I am K&Ring... OneGrassRoot May 2013 #11
because you're one of the few who actually read it. HiPointDem May 2013 #14
I read it and gave it a rec Capt. Obvious May 2013 #22
I've yet to see an actual Bostonian have this concern treestar May 2013 #53
We have been arguing ourselves blue in the face about how this was not such a smirkymonkey May 2013 #68
KnR. nt tblue37 May 2013 #19
I visited his blog for general reading. He's good. tblue37 May 2013 #29
Sometimes decisions to close like here are out of Fenway's hands. no_hypocrisy May 2013 #20
"...one wounded boy..." randome May 2013 #21
Yes, but it was important to tell us that it was a dyadic pair, and not a decadent threesome, winter is coming May 2013 #27
Yep, that language minimizes both the threat Union Scribe May 2013 #42
it was appalling mgcgulfcoast May 2013 #24
People killed, limbs blown off, hundreds injured. 'Minor attack'. Another non-Bostonian, I take it? randome May 2013 #25
Other terrorists see they can get caught treestar May 2013 #54
A lot of morons post a lot of dumb stuff on the internet. And we get to read it here. Buzz Clik May 2013 #28
This Bostonian disagrees MannyGoldstein May 2013 #30
Manny, your posts often irk me, thucythucy May 2013 #41
Well... MannyGoldstein May 2013 #56
England had "Keep Calm and Carry On" - the US has Let the Fear Paralyze You. liberal N proud May 2013 #31
I read it all and I like the writing.. wercal May 2013 #32
K&R. Good points, well written. (nt) Paladin May 2013 #35
The author is rather self-indulgent and doesn't make a valid comparison mythology May 2013 #40
A good opinion piece would not base opinion on lies Progressive dog May 2013 #44
Didn't make it past "...overextended the First Amendment..." Blue_Tires May 2013 #45
The Boston situation was resolved within a week. Baitball Blogger May 2013 #48
Did he coin the word "Torquemadize?" LuvNewcastle May 2013 #49
Entirely different scenarios treestar May 2013 #50
Pretty sure that the air raid sirens caused voluntary lockdown all across London. JoePhilly May 2013 #55
Straw man comparison cheyanne May 2013 #58
just german spies frylock May 2013 #65
Lame analogy. Keeping the dance halls open was about morale RZM May 2013 #59
I have been saying this since we got Homeland Security..... AnneD May 2013 #60
Children were under mandatory evacuation jberryhill May 2013 #61
Look, it's Captain Hindsight to the rescue! City of Mills May 2013 #63
The terrorists win when the people cringe in fear..that's the point of terrorism. Tierra_y_Libertad May 2013 #64
Sadly you're wasting your breath whatchamacallit May 2013 #66
I think a short term city shut down is OK with a lot of people LeftInTX May 2013 #67
What a stupid comparison. How long did the Blitz last and what did it involve? MADem May 2013 #69
Second guessing everything just to be critical is awesome! lunatica May 2013 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"London kept the dance ha...