Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is five year old thinking. A five year old cannot comprehend gun safety. [View all]LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)28. This latest firearm atrocity reminded me of my childhood -
i had joked in some comments elsewhere about maybe some day there'd be "Baby's First Colt .45". I didn't know such a thing as the Cricket existed. There is no way in Hell a child needs to have a real firearm.
I hadn't had a reason to remember this before for all these years - when I was a kid in the '50s we played with cap guns. Just a toy gun that made a noise and smelled of gunpowder after pulling the trigger. I googled "cap guns" and found this: http://www.nicholscapguns.com/about.htm
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
101 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
This is five year old thinking. A five year old cannot comprehend gun safety. [View all]
nolabear
May 2013
OP
kids are different though, i dont trust my daughter in traffic but with horses no problem
loli phabay
May 2013
#2
little bit fishy needs defining, i would also report if i heard a kid was carrying unsupervised
loli phabay
May 2013
#7
We are talking about 5 year olds ,would you trust any 5 year old hunting even supervised?
newmember
May 2013
#35
for me the problem is unsupervised access to firearms, same as unsupervised access to the river
loli phabay
May 2013
#81
there is already age limits on gun ownership, my daughter does not own her .22 i do
loli phabay
May 2013
#89
legally she does not but in all sense she does, good luck getting laws passed to stop parents
loli phabay
May 2013
#91
good luck with that. i think you will find more kids die from unsupervised drownings and falls
loli phabay
May 2013
#93
they can swim, her better than him though its mostly the river and ponds they swim in
loli phabay
May 2013
#101
Actually I don't think you will hear anything like you claim, espcially not here at DU
ProgressiveProfessor
May 2013
#4
My concern would be the same as letting him put a fork in a socket as long as the power is off.
nolabear
May 2013
#8
At no point should your hypothetical children be exposed to an unsecured gun.
AtheistCrusader
May 2013
#41
Speaking of proportions. A child can be easily tricked with coins by what they percieve as bigger.
freshwest
May 2013
#56
"I have said consistently that I believe that the Second Amendment is an individual right."
hack89
May 2013
#74
I see this one. My point remains though. I wouldn't trust him to think like an adult.
nolabear
May 2013
#36
I know what he's doing and you don't clear a pistol with half of your hand over the muzzle.
newmember
May 2013
#58
this is bad adult supervision same as the adult who leaves kids in aa car on a hot day
loli phabay
May 2013
#72
One more thing I would like to add is, the context of your argument is that some 5 year olds can...
W T F
May 2013
#43
A 5 year old could be confused as to WHY someone wants the right to bear arms...
Spitfire of ATJ
May 2013
#13
technically my daughter does not own her rifle i do, she just has use of it on our range
loli phabay
May 2013
#75
big difference is that you used cap guns firing them off willy nilly, my daughter fires one round at
loli phabay
May 2013
#70
and yet the boys learned to shoot each other with no consequence, whereas my daughter learns
loli phabay
May 2013
#79