General Discussion

nykym

(3,063 posts)

32. If they are marketing the gun to children

Fri May 3, 2013, 09:57 AM

May 2013

Last edited Fri May 3, 2013, 01:38 PM - Edit history (1)

then they would need to pass CPSIA standards.
For the life of me I cannot understand why bullets which contain lead are exempt?
Let alone the implied destructive force of the rife.
They probably get around it by marketing to kids over 12.

Did some checking, found out that guns and ammo are regulated by the ATF.
Most shops will not sell to anyone under 16 years of age.

SO why is it they can get away with calling it a toy?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

55 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Here's How the Rifle That Just Killed a 2-Year-Old Girl Is Marketed for Kids [View all] Coyotl May 2013 OP

It appears to me that the kids in Jenoch May 2013 #1

I'm sure their lawyers made certain of that! Coyotl May 2013 #2

What lawsuits? nt. premium May 2013 #23

Yup, the photographer was right there behind the camera Progressive dog May 2013 #28

You must be hallucinating. GeorgeGist May 2013 #53

Do you believe the photographs were all taken by children? Jenoch May 2013 #55

Where's the outrage for ATV manufacturers marketing their vehicles to kids? ATV's kill & maim KittyWampus May 2013 #3

you forgot your sarcasm thingie... Whisp May 2013 #12

ATVs were designed to do so? regards uponit7771 May 2013 #19

Warning Will Robinson. Misdirection attempt incoming. MattBaggins May 2013 #22

DO NOT TALK ABOUT GUNS Uzair May 2013 #31

There is a special place in Hell for these people. BlueStreak May 2013 #4

yes! right behind bucket manufacturers! nt galileoreloaded May 2013 #5

Thinking. I don't think you're doing it right. nt EOTE May 2013 #33

wait your right. its the 2 inches of water and NOT the bucket that is deadly galileoreloaded May 2013 #35

Nope, you still haven't got it quite right. EOTE May 2013 #37

i'm lazy and non reactionary...what can i say. nt galileoreloaded May 2013 #43

Probably not, but you can send them to the other...what, five (5) threads...on this. Eleanors38 May 2013 #7

Makes me nostalgic holdencaufield May 2013 #6

Those were the days BlueStreak May 2013 #38

Rather the diverse family.... representing all of import from the "good old days" LanternWaste May 2013 #45

So 60,000 plus kids have guns and aren't shooting each other with them? The Straight Story May 2013 #8

So it's not about the gun, it's about the supervision? Got it. Cali_Democrat May 2013 #9

Over half of them are suicides Mojorabbit May 2013 #10

Even if you remove suicides the equation, which shouldn't be done.... Cali_Democrat May 2013 #11

Once again Mojorabbit May 2013 #13

I agree that the safety net plays a part Cali_Democrat May 2013 #14

This is true-- guns are certainly part of the problem, but... TreasonousBastard May 2013 #18

Overall violent crime in the US is not higher than in Western Europe, Canada, etc. DanTex May 2013 #34

To be fair, Japan has an incredibly high suicide rate. mwrguy May 2013 #16

they also have gejohnston May 2013 #51

It's never about the gun. baldguy May 2013 #25

Probably for the same reason Minnesota has more snowmobile deaths than Florida krispos42 May 2013 #39

Guns are created to kill. That's what they're for . . . MrModerate May 2013 #15

Do you even care that a 2 year old is dead? Uzair May 2013 #29

I don't own a gun, so no fetish here. I argue based on simple principle, no emotions The Straight Story May 2013 #49

They Look Like Toys otohara May 2013 #17

We will be living with this for generations. What or who will they be aiming at? freshwest May 2013 #20

We have been living with this for a long time, it is just getting worse. Coyotl May 2013 #21

Except that it isn't getting worse metalbot May 2013 #24

Columbine, ......... .... ... ... n/t Coyotl May 2013 #26

We don't know how low murder/wound/intimidation/abuse rate would be without all the friggin guns, or Hoyt May 2013 #30

Gun violence has been getting worse. DanTex May 2013 #36

I think that's incorrect krispos42 May 2013 #40

I said gun violence specifically. Gun assaults are up: DanTex May 2013 #41

Ah, okay, I see what you mean. krispos42 May 2013 #48

I'm aware of the history. This is no longer needed to establish the country. To destroy it, next. freshwest May 2013 #44

How can violent video games be the problem Shankapotomus May 2013 #27

If they are marketing the gun to children nykym May 2013 #32

how can they say it is "marketing to children" since they can't buy it? gejohnston May 2013 #52

Clearly you don't have kids. IveWornAHundredPants May 2013 #54

Coming up next: kid-marketed power tools! backscatter712 May 2013 #42

I wouldn't give a 4 or 5 year old a damn BB or paintball gun ("you'll put your eye out!") Bake May 2013 #46

As kids we were not allowed to have a BB gun because they were too dangerous. Coyotl May 2013 #47

I grew up in the city, never was a hunter as a child. Bake May 2013 #50