My sis found this on FB: "Now that the Dow is at an all time high ...

[Fuddnik]

54. That's what I mean. During the depression seniors DIDN'T nave anything to supplement.

Roosevelt intended it to be a minimal, livable retirement program.

Back then, the only working class people who had pensions were railroaders, who were covered by the Railroad Retirement System, which Social Security was modeled on. It still survives today, is very healthy, and pays much better benefits than Social Security.

If every President since Eisenhower didn't tweak COLA, unemployment, and GDP figures to make themselves look better, Social Security benefits would be almost double what they're paying out now.

Here's an excerpt from "Bad Money", by Kevin Phillips. Excerpt originally published in Harpers.

http://www.tampabay.com/news/hard-numbers-the-economy-is-worse-than-you-know/473596

Ever since the 1960s, Washington has gulled its citizens and creditors by debasing official statistics, the vital instruments with which the vigor and muscle of the American economy are measured.

The effect has been to create a false sense of economic achievement and rectitude, allowing us to maintain artificially low interest rates, massive government borrowing, and a dangerous reliance on mortgage and financial debt even as real economic growth has been slower than claimed.

The corruption has tainted the very measures that most shape public perception of the economy:

• The monthly Consumer Price Index (CPI), which serves as the chief bellwether of inflation;

• The quarterly Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which tracks the U.S. economy's overall growth;

• The monthly unemployment figure, which for the general public is perhaps the most vivid indicator of economic health or infirmity.

Not only do governments, businesses and individuals use these yardsticks in their decisionmaking, but minor revisions in the data can mean major changes in household circumstances — inflation measurements help determine interest rates, federal interest payments on the national debt, and cost-of-living increases for wages, pensions and Social Security benefits.

And, of course, our statistics have political consequences too. An administration is helped when it can mouth banalities about price levels being "anchored" as food and energy costs begin to soar.

The truth, though it would not exactly set Americans free, would at least open a window to wider economic and political understanding. Readers should ask themselves how much angrier the electorate might be if the media, over the past five years, had been citing 8 percent unemployment (instead of 5 percent), 5 percent inflation (instead of 2 percent), and average annual growth in the 1 percent range (instead of the 3-4 percent range).

(snip) more